Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
The type of consequences imposed to the violation of the rule will be depended on the severity of the violation.
- If the violation is not to severe, the violators would most likely only receive Publication of an admonishment by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. In this case, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants will publicly let the public know about the violators, but this does not lead to the suspension of the violators.
- If the violation is severe, Suspension and monetary penalty would most likely be imposed by AICPA and IRS.
They wanted to set such violators as an example so other members would be discouraged to conduct another violation.
Answer:
Babur.
Explanation:
Babur (1483-1530) was a conqueror and warrior and he founded the Mughal Empire in India. Babur was a descendant from the famous Turkic conqueror Timur The Lame. On his mother´s side, his family line descended from Gengis Khan. His first conquests as emir of Ferghana were made in Central Asia, including Samarkand in today´s Uzbekistan, but he lost them because of power intrigues and betrayals. However, his great chance came in India, where he coveted the Delhi Sultanate. He defeated the army of sultan Ibrahim Lodi and took his throne in 1526. This is the beginning of the Mughal Empire.
The human body as you would expect, it produces free
radicals and the antioxidants to counter their harmful properties. But,
sometimes free radicals outnumbers the naturally occurring antioxidants. For it
to sustain the stability, a constant source of external foundations of
antioxidants is required in order to gain the extreme welfares of antioxidants.
Antioxidants gives benefit to the body by counteracting and eradicating the
free radicals from the bloodstream of our body.
It was expanded to slow more traffic for boats and larger boats its also knows has the third lock project . yes this was literally its main purpose <span />
Answer:
Freedom enough for the criticism to be the positive one.
Explanation:
First of all if you are at the top of one company you have to use your authority to improve the work of employees. But criticism should never be based on punctuation, elevated tone, or any kind of force.
Freedom to criticize primarily should be in form of a feedback. The way in which a employee will be criticized must be be made by comments about his work, not to criticize "a person".
Criticism must start with asking questions and listening to the employee, understanding and deciding what to do next. It should not be over-criticized, but rather small-dose criticism is recommended. It is also very important that criticism be at the right time when needed, not delayed.
