According to Merton's typology of prejudice and discrimination, Xavier is an unprejudiced nondiscriminator, whereas Reuben is a prejudiced nondiscriminator.
<h3>Unprejudiced vs. Prejudiced</h3>
Xavier and Reuben cannot be accused of discrimination of African Americans since they both accept them in their chess club. However, there is a big difference between Xavier and Reuben, even if their behavior is the same.
Xavier truly believes African Americans are as intelligent as white Americans, which means he is unprejudiced. Reuben, on the other hand, does not hold the same belief. He is prejudiced against African Americans, thinking they have weak cognitive abilities.
Therefore, even though both can be considered nondiscriminators, Xavier is unprejudiced, whereas Reuben is prejudiced.
Learn more about nondiscriminators here:
brainly.com/question/13782165
#SPJ12
Answer:
<em>c.cognitive dissonance. </em>
Explanation:
<em>In psychology, </em><em>the term cognitive dissonance is described as the discomfort experienced by an individual because of holding different conflicting values, ideas, and beliefs more or less at the same time. A person who is experiencing cognitive dissonance tends to hold conflicting attitude and thinking-pattern and due to which the person feels uneasy. People often encompasses bias while seeking consonance between their reality and expectations.</em>
<em>In reference to the question, Carlos wants to reduce cognitive dissonance.</em>
Answer:
The answer is uninvolved parenting style.
Explanation:
This style is often characterised by a lack of attention to the child's needs. For this reason, it is sometmes called neglectful parenting. Uninvolved parents also tend to make little demands to their children.
Some of the effects this style has on children include poor social and academic skills, emotional isolation and dependency towards other people.
