The correct option is (b) negligent hiring.
State courts have ruled that companies can be held liable for negligent hiring if they fail to do adequate background checks.
<h3>What is negligent hiring doctrine?</h3>
According to the doctrine of negligent hiring, a company is responsible for any injury its workers do to third parties if they knew or should have known that the employee posed a danger of doing so, or if a reasonable investigation would have revealed the risk.
The causes of negligence hiring are-
- Whether the employee's unfitness was the cause of the injuries that resulted
- Whether the employer knew or should have known (had the employer used ordinary care) of the employee's unfitness at the time of employment. Each state has a different liability standard.
An employer be concerned about negligent hiring and retention because-
- An employer may be liable for real injuries, pain and suffering, and even punitive damages if they fail to discipline an employee who poses a danger of injury to coworkers, clients, and others.
- The company may be held liable if these employees go on to commit careless or reckless conduct that could endanger others.
The elements of a negligent retention claim include all of the following:
- An affiliation with a company.
- The employee's lack of expertise.
- The employer may have had actual or constructive awareness of the ineptitude.
- An employee's action or inaction that resulted in the plaintiff's injuries.
To know more about the negligent hiring with example, here
brainly.com/question/24208900
#SPJ4
Answer: Pandemic: awful. Vaccine: useful; get it. Masks: not really required, your still breathing your air, just through tiny gaps in fabric.
Explanation:
just my opinion.
So, doing the calculations, Marion's had $700,000-240,000=$460,000-160,000 in expenses = $300,000 x 0.4 income tax=120,000 and so 300,000-120,000=$180,000 net value. Preston's had $700,000-40,000 depreciation=$660,000-160,000 expenses =$500,000 x 0.4 taxes= 200,000 taxes so 500,000-200,000=$300,000 net value. The result is Preston's had less depreciation which provided it with more spendable income.
Answer:
Grace is incorrect because of the veil and alter ego theory
Explanation:
In this scenario Grace formed a corporation along with her three friends. As a result of catering services offered guest became ill and sued Grace and the other owners for damages.
According to the alter egos theory personal liability can be invoked on the owners of a corporation or its limited liability members.
Alter ego theory is used to penetrate the corporate veil that protects shareholders. Personal liability can be assigned on the business owner as it is in this case against Grace and the other owners.
We can actually deduce here that when building the Complete 2nd Order Model, one can do all except: C. Create an interaction between age and each of the levels of job satisfaction.
<h3>What is Complete Second Order Model?</h3>
The complete second degree (order) model is actually known to be a polynomial model that includes the linear terms, second degree terms and the interaction term.
The options that complete the question are:
A. Create a curvilinear term for job satisfaction
B. Create an interaction between unemployment rate and age
C. Create an interaction between age and each of the levels of job satisfaction
D. Create a curvilinear term for age.
Thus, options C is the one that wouldn't be carried out in the Complete Second Order Model.
Learn more about Human Resources on brainly.com/question/25443563
#SPJ11
