The answer is:
The following options benefit African consumers but not African farmers.
I. Subsidies to keep crop prices low
IV. Availability of imported grains
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>If you were to subsidize to keep prices low, consumers would benefit exclusively because the would pay a fixed rate for their farm products. On the other hand farmers would be affected because we don't know many factors that would influence this decission. Some of these factors may be.</em>
<em>- Will there be a price fixed for certain products</em>
<em>- Will the grains be cash crops</em>
<em>- Will farmers be allowed to rotate crops</em>
<em>Without knowing these factors one can only assume that when you susidize a crop the conditions imposed on the farmers may or may not be ideal.</em>
<em>When it comes to the availability of imported grains, some of these grains may be even cheaper than local grains. This may have a negative effect on local farmers who cannot lower their prices at a loss. Consumers would definitely benefit by paying lower prices from imported crops.</em>
Two statements which show some American objection to the 2000 Presidential election were:
- 1. The Supreme Court's ruling on the Florida recount appeared partisan to many observers.
- 5. George W. Bush was elected in spite of losing the popular vote.
<h3>What happened in the 2000 Presidential election?</h3>
George Bush was able to beat Al Gore even though he lost the popular vote because he won at the Electoral College.
This caused consternation amongst Americans as well as the ruling by the Supreme Court on the Florida recount appearing to be partisan - in favor of a party.
Find out more on the 2000 Presidential election at brainly.com/question/556024.
Ma major reason why many conservatives disagreed with New Deal economic policies was because "<span>Many conservatives believed in balanced budgets, low taxes, and low government spending," since the New Deal caused the government to spend a great deal of money. </span>
<span>Bethel Baptist Church</span>
