The radical Republicans in Congress were infuriated by Johnson’s actions. They refused to allow southern representatives and senators to take their seats in Congress. President Johnson vetoed both of these bills, but congress overturned both vetoes. (Hope this helped mark brainliest plsss❤️)
The end of the Civil War led to conflicting visions within the United States government about how to rebuild the nation. Centered on The Political Struggle, Part Three of Facing History's video series about the Reconstruction, this lesson explains the struggle between President Andrew Johnson and Congressional Republicans over establishing justice and healing after the war. By watching the video and analyzing historical documents, students will understand that negotiating a society’s universe of obligation in times of crisis can be a significant source of conflict and reveal the fragility of democracy. Students will also reflect on deeper issues of healing and justice in the aftermath of both a devastating war and a profound transformation of society.
This lesson is part of Facing History's work on the Reconstruction era, and part of a series of video-based web lessons. Use this lesson to engage students in conversations around the political battles over the direction of Reconstruction between 1865 and 1867. In addition to the suggestions below, see Lesson 5, 6, and 7 in The Reconstruction Era & the Fragility of Democracy for more resources and background information about the struggle between President Johnson and the Republicans in Congress during Reconstruction.
After analyzing the Nast engraving, introduce students to the dilemma of healing and justice after the Civil War more explicitly. You can do this by asking the class to make connections between the perspective expressed by Nast and the analysis of a contemporary historian of this history.
Historian David Blight describes two central, and often conflicting, challenges of Reconstruction:
One was healing and the other was justice. How do you have them both? What truly constitutes healing of a people, of a nation, that’s suffered this scale of violence and destruction, and how do you have justice? And justice for whom?
