All categories

3 years ago

Answer please if you can:))

Mathematics

1 answer:

MaRussiya [10]3 years ago

5 0

I can’t see the exact numbers because the pic is blurry but here’s how to solve it.

The three angles in a triangle always add up to 180. So subtract the angle that’s given and you’ll have the sum of the two other angles. Since it’s an equilateral triangle, the other two angles are the same.
So write the equation 2(whatever the angle is) = the number you get when you do 180-the given angle

For example (I’m not sure these numbers are right because the pic is blurry)
2(9x+7)=114
Then you would solve for x and once you get x, plug it into the angle expression 9x+ 7 or whatever to get the angle measure.

You might be interested in

Please solve it <br>find the value of x

DENIUS [597]

Answer:

The measure of angle x is 25 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since triangle ABC is an isosceles triangle, the measure of angle BAC is equal to the measure of angle ACB. Angle ABC = 80 degrees, leaving 100 degrees to be divided equally for the measures of the other two angles. Now that you know that angle ACB = 50 degrees, you can calculate the value of angle ACD and determine that angle ACD = 130 degrees. Triangle ACD is also an isosceles triangle, and the two equal legs are AC and CD. Since angle ACD = 130 degrees, the other two angles have a total of 50 degrees. Splitting the 50 degrees equally between the two angles gives you 25 degrees as the value of angle CAD, which is labeled "x."

8 0

3 years ago

The Salk polio vaccine experiment in 1954 focused on the effectiveness of the vaccine in combating paralytic polio. Because it w

sdas [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The variables of interest are:

X₁: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the placebo vaccine.

n₁= 201299 total children studied

x₁= 110 cases observed

X₂: Number of cases of polio observed in kids that received the experimental vaccine.

n₂= 200745 total children studied

x₂= 33 cases observed

These two variables have a binomial distribution. The parameters of interest, the ones to compare, are the population proportions: p₁ vs p₂

You have to test if the population proportions of children who contracted polio in both groups are different: p₂ ≠ p₁

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.05

$Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }$

Sample proportion placebo p'₁= x₁/n₁= 110/201299= 0.0005

Sample proportion vaccine p'₂= x₂/n₂= 33/200745= 0.0002

Pooled sample proportion p'= (x₁+x₂)/(n₁+n₂)= (110+33)/(201299+200745)= 0.0004

$Z_{H_0}= \frac{(0.0002-0.0005)-0}{\sqrt{0.0004[\frac{1}{201299} +\frac{1}{200745} ]} }= -4.76$

This test is two-tailed, using the critical value approach, you have to determine two critical values:

$Z_{\alpha/2}= Z_{0.025}= -1.96$

$Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.975}= 1.96$

Then if $Z_{H_0}$ ≤ -1.96 or if $Z_{H_0}$ ≥ 1.96, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -1.96 < $Z_{H_0}$ < 1.96, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ $Z_{H_0}$ = -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

H₀: p₂ = p₁

H₁: p₂ ≠ p₁

α: 0.01

$Z= \frac{(p'_2-p'_1)-(p_2-p_1)}{\sqrt{p'[\frac{1}{n_1} +\frac{1}{n_2} ]} }$

The value of $Z_{H_0}$ = -4.76 doesn't change, since we are working with the same samples.

The only thing that changes alongside with the level of significance is the rejection region:

$Z_{\alpha /2}= Z_{0.005}= -2.576$

$Z_{1-\alpha /2}= Z_{0.995}= 2.576$

Then if $Z_{H_0}$ ≤ -2.576or if $Z_{H_0}$ ≥ 2.576, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If -2.576< $Z_{H_0}$ < 2.576, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

⇒ $Z_{H_0}$ = -4.76, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

Remember the level of significance (probability of committing type I error) is the probability of rejecting a true null hypothesis. This means that the smaller this value is, the fewer chances you have of discarding the true null hypothesis. But as you know, you cannot just reduce this value to zero because, the smaller α is, the bigger β (probability of committing type II error) becomes.

Rejecting the null hypothesis using different values of α means that there is a high chance that you reached a correct decision (rejecting a false null hypothesis)

I hope this helps!

8 0

4 years ago

Pleaseeee helppp !!!!!!!! Will mark Brianliest !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LuckyWell [14K]

Since triangle STU and TVW are similar angle VWT and SUW are equal, this means:
106-5x=7x-14
(106)+(14)=(7x)+(5x)
120=(12x)
10=(x)
Angle VWT=106-5x=106-(5)(10)=56

6 0

3 years ago

Johnny will work 15 hours a week during the 36 week school year, and 40 hours a

Goryan [66]

The answer is B-5,310

4 0

4 years ago

Simplify. 2+35x−1−15x 1+25x 3−45x 1−25x 3+25x

Lelu [443]

Answer:

Option A is correct.

$1+\frac{2}{5}x$