In order to persuade someone, the idea presented should be convincing through facts and arguments. The author of the passage claims that nothing is impossible by showing different scenarios in which the outcome seemed impossible at the time but was achieved anyways. People were able to climb Mount Everest, create a machine that help humans fly and even walk on the moon.
Answer:
Authorial Intent is the idea that maintains that the person who writes a text has a privileged way to understand its meaning and that because of this, any other way in which said text is interpreted and that contradicts this understanding must conform to the author's intentions.
John Green's opinion on authorial intent is that he thinks it is irrelevant and sees the authors as a character more from the book. He supports those who oppose this thinking.
She’s possibly trying to evoke pity, fear, a sense of injustice, or even make the reader feel a sort of sadness because you know that the person you are reading about is getting hurt emotionally. Something we individuals find despicable and inhumane. Also, threatening and menacing a person with hell fire in their last moments of living is pretty evil because God is a generous person who doesn’t cause grief and if the person believes such lies they will not only die unhappy but they will also become fearful to even die.
False, you do not need to provide documentation for a source you have not directly quoted. (I'm in high school so I'm just going off with what I know.)