Any answer choices? i would say that they would have brown hair, missing fingers and a tattoo
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
Answer is Option A: long hours, unsafe working conditions, and hard labor
Explanation:
In the late 19th century, there was unfair hiring and unacceptable working conditions. Unemployment was high and very less skills were required (because of more use of machines) to be employed in the industries which meant that the workers could be replaced easily. Also, the working hours were very long. All of these led to formation of labor unions. They were formed to protect the common and most needed interests of the workers. They fought for better salaries, short working hours and better working conditions in the industry.
Answer:
Please provide more information,this is a website to help with answers and that and we are not understanding your question