Answer:
Explanation:
May 3
Dr merchandise inventory 27,000
Cr Cash 27,000
May 5
Dr Accounts receivable 19,500
Cr Sales 19,500
May 5
Dr COGS 13,500
Cr Merchandise inventory 13,500
May 7
Dr Sales returns and allowances 1,950
Cr Accounts receivable 1950
Dr Merchandise inventory 1350
Cr COGS 1350
May 8
Dr Sales returns and allowances 750
Cr Accounts receivable 750
May 15
Dr Cash 16464
Dr Sales discount 336
Cr Account receivable 16800
19500-1950-750 = 16800
16800*2% = 336
Answer:
The incremental benefit cost ratio is less than 1 therefore we must select site 1.
Explanation:
The incremental BCR can be determined using the following formula

8% , 10)
⇒ 
⇒
8%, 20)
⇒ 
⇒
= $203,704.42
Incremental initial investment = 203,704.42 - 149,029.49
= $ 54,674.93
Incremental benefits = 580,000 - 520,000 = 60,000
Incremental O&M = 75,000 - 80,000 = - $ 5000
Incremental Disbenefits = 140,000 - 90,000 =$ 50,000

All solving using the present worth method also incremental benefit cost ratio comes out to be 0.2743.
The incremental benefit cost ratio is less than 1 therefore we must select site 1.
Answer:
B. The sales tax you pay when you fill your car up with gas is regress
Explanation:
Gasoline tax is regressive because everyone regardless of their income level pay the same amount of tax per gallon of gas purchased. A progressive tax means that people that have higher incomes will pay a higher tax rate, for example, federal income taxes. Every flat tax (same percentage for everyone) is regressive.
Answer:
$11,160.097
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Future value of machine = $44,309.00
Time, n = 16 years
Discount rate, r = 9.00% = 0.09
Now,
The amount Derek is will to pay will be the present value of the machine
Also,
we know
Future value = Present value × (1 + r)ⁿ
on substituting the respective values, we get
$44,309.00 = Present value × (1 + 0.09 )¹⁶
or
$44,309.00 = Present value × 3.97
or
Present value = $44,309.00 ÷ 3.97
or
Present value = $11,160.097
Answer: Trade off analysis
Explanation: In simple words, it refers to the decision making technique under which the decision maker gives up one thing for gaining the other.
In the given case, Global corp. were asking their consumers to prioritize the attributes they were expecting from the new product. The higher demanded attribute would have been added and the lower one will be neglected.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct answer is trade off.