Answer:
The correct option is B,15.65%
Explanation:
Modified Internal Rate of Return(MIRR) can be determined by using the excel MIRR function,whose formula is given below:
=MIRR(values,finance rate,reinvestment rate)
The values are the cash inflows and the initial capital outlay of $850
the finance rate is the same as the reinvestment of 10% which is the rate of return that would make the investment present values of cash inflows equal the initial investment
MIRR=15.65% as found in the attached.
At which level will a manager use analytics to make decisions? All of the above. A manager will use analytics to make deisions at the operational, managerial and strategic level of management. Managers need to make sure they make their decisions based off of analytics and facts not just what they think is the right decision. By using analytics, they are able to back up their decisions and explain why those are the decisions that are being made.
(b.) FALSE
Hezerberg gave the Two-factor theory also known as dual-factor theory and Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory. It states that there are few things in the organization and company or any workplace that leads to satisfaction of a worker. These things are hygiene and motivation.
Answer:
Market value of common stocks = 12,100 x $55 = $665,500
Market value of preferred stock = 310 x $91 = $28,210
Market value of bonds = 370 x $2,230 = $825,100
Market value of the company $1,518,810
Capital structure weight of preferred stocks
= $28,210/$1,518,810
= 0.0186
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
In this question, we need to calculate the market value of the company, which is the aggregate of market value of equity, market value of preferred stocks and market value of bond. The capital structure weight of preferred stock is the ratio of market value of preferred stock to market value of the company.
Answer:
- Production Possibility Frontiers for Two Countries find in attachments.
- Opportunity cost for America for automobile production is less as compared to for Japan, for producing 50 more units of Automobiles America has to forgo 5 tons of Steel where as for Japan to produce 100 more units of Automobiles Japan has to forgo 7 units of steel.
- Japan has absolute Advantage in production of both Automobiles and Steel but it has comparative advantage in production of steel as it is 1.2 times better at producing steel as it is on automobiles as which is only 1.1 times more of what America produces.
- America has comparative advantage in the production of Cars as its opportunity cost for producing cars is less than Japan.
- The trade between two countries is possible at Japan producing more of Steel and America producing more of Cars.
Explanation
Figure 1-A showing America's Production Possibility Frontier, where on x Axis Steel Production per hour and on Y-Axis Automobiles or Cars Production. The Maximum level of Automobiles America Produces is 250 spending all of its resources over production of Automobiles where as 25 tons Steel maximum it can produce spending all of its resources producing Steel so the line between the two maximum attainable points is the production possibility frontier for cars and steel per hour for America.
Figure 1-B showing Japan's production possibility Frontier, where on Y-Axis is the 275 cars which it can produce spending all of its resources and on X-Axis the 30 tons of steel and line joining both is the production possibility frontier for Japan.
Table 1 and Figure 2, showing opportunity cost for America and Japan where two production possibility frontiers are drawn in one graph and diff levels of trade off's between cars (y-axis) and steel (x-axis) are compared
from the table the conclusion about the absolute and comparative advantage can be drawn as japan produces higher levels of both products so it has absolute advantage of producing both cars and steel over America , but Japan produces 1.1 times more cars then America and 1.2 times more Steel then America indicating it has comparative advantage in producing steel then Cars, however comparative advantage in true sense is when the opportunity cost for producing a product is less compared to producing other the graph in Figure 2, shows that for America if production of cars reduces from 150 to 100 America produces 5 tons more steel from level 10 to 15 at x-axis where as for same levels if Japan reduces its production from 150 to 100 Japan produces 8 tons more steel. so opportunity cost for producing more steel for Japan is less as it has to forgo lesser number of cars compared to America if America has to produce 8 tons more steel it has to forgo more of its cars as compared to Japan.
The trade between two countries is possible at levels where both has comparative advantage the output (global production) will be greater if both countries trade at levels where they have advantage like America should trade at levels where it spends more of its resources producing cars and Japan should trade at levels where it produces more of its resources producing Steel. A country can not forgo production of a product where it does not have absolute or comparative advantage as it would lead to sect-oral unemployment.