Answer:
Option 2 is the right answer
Explanation:
When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.
<u>Embezzlement</u> is the theft or misuse of <u>company funds by executives </u>
Explanation:
<u>Embezzlement, refers to the act of withholding the assets of a company with the intention of conversion(theft) by one or more person to whom the assets where entrusted .It is a type of financial fraud</u>
I think it’s B but I’m not sure if it’s correct tho
Answer:
Individual rights are balanced against the individual rights of others, and the rights of everyone as a whole, or the common good, or basically, what benefits everyone. ... The government and courts can also use their power to keep individuals from harming the public as a whole when utilizing their individual rights.
Answer:
Yes and no.
Explanation:
Yes because he could have been forced into this.
No because there could be parental consent.
