I believe that writers are definitely justified in challenging the artistic status quo, because that's what true artists do. But to answer the question of why they do it, there are more answers. Think of Emily Dickinson, for example. She always strongly stood by her own freedoms and decisions to go against the current, and she's one of the most famous of American writers because of it. Aside from the fact she wanted to, going against the norm for writers often gives them more attention than if they wrote what was "expected" at the time. When studying famous American writers, we are often told to study things that they did differently than most, some, mostly the less notable today, only had minor differences, like they made their stories from different tenses, etc. But the most notorious used themes that may have been taboo and writing styles even more diverse. There is always the counter culture and most writers that we study belonged to it, sick of the large amount of similar, traditional stories that lacked element, or simply wanted to stand out.
Another reason could be that writers wanted to spread the written word to all different kinds of things that have yet to be written about, different characters that haven't yet been discovered. And there are the related reasons like how writers didn't even know they were writing for the public, only time tells, like with Ann Frank. She wasn't afraid to put opinions down on paper because it was her own personal journal but it had become a famous piece of literature because of the opinions.
I think writers break from tradition because the traditions are often not realistic and these artists are the only ones who will tell the truth, and that is why they do it, and that is why they are so important.
If an author is trying to tell a story in present tense they will use words such as "Is" rather than "was", or other present tense words.
Answer:
She believes in me; and I wouldn’t do another crooked thing for the world.
Explanation:
Usually someone believing in something or the main character investing in something will be the central idea.
Answer:
I think the answer to you question is hopeful
An American Spy
<h2>Further Explanation
</h2>
In Olen Steinhauer's bestseller The Tourist, reluctant CIA agent Milo Weaver uncovered a conspiracy linking the Chinese government to the very best reaches of the American United States Intelligence Community, including his own Department of Tourism - the foremost clandestine department within the Company. The shocking blowback arrived within the Hammett Award-winning the closest Exit when the Department of Tourism was almost completely worn out because of the results of an excellent more insidious plot.
Following on the heels of those two spectacular novels comes An American Spy, Olen Steinhauer's most stunning thriller yet. With only some of "tourists" - CIA-trained assassins - left, Weaver would really like to maneuver on and use this as a chance to regain a traditional life, a life focused on his family. His former boss within the CIA, Alan Drummond, can't let it go. When Alan uses one in all Milo's compromised aliases to jaunt London then disappears, calling all types of attention to his actions, Milo can not help but get in search of him.
Worse still, it's commencing to look as if Tourism's enemies are gearing up for a final, fatal blow.
With An American Spy, Olen Steinhauer, far and away from the simplest espionage writer during a generation, delivers a searing international thriller which will settle once and for all who is pulling the strings and who is being played.
Learn more
An american spy brainly.com/question/11006397
Details
Grade: Middle School
Subject: English
keywords: american, spy.
