Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Geometric sequence
Each term in a geometric sequence can be computed as the previous term by a constant number called the common ratio. The formula to get the term n is

where
is the first term of the sequence
The problem describes Georgie took 275 mg of the medicine for her cold in the first hour and that in each subsequent hour, the amount of medicine in her body is 91% (0.91) of the amount from the previous hour. It can be written as
amount in hour n = amount in hour n-1 * 0.91
a)
This information provides the necessary data to write the general term as

b)
In the 8th hour (n=8), the remaining medicine present is Georgie's body is



Answer:
im in 8th grade and im getting your questions
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Eight times ten plus six times one plus two times one-tenth plus seven times one-thousandth.
Step-by-step explanation:
(8 x 10) = eight times ten
(6 x 1) = six times one
(2 x 0.1) = two times one-tenth
(7 x 0.001) = seven times one-thousandth
I am not always the best with the equations to words stuff, so please comment if I am wrong!
X2+5x+y2-y=-2
X2+2*5x2+(5/2)^2-(5/2)^2+y2-2*y/2+(1/2)^2-(1/2)^2=-2
(x+5/2)^2+(y-1/2)^2-13/2=-2
(x+5/2)^2+(y-1/2)^2=9/2
So centre =(-5/2,1/2)
Radius=(9/2)^(1/2)
Answer:
The p value would be given by:
For this case since th p value is lower than the significance level of0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly different from 46.7 MPG
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
represent the mean
represent the population standard deviation
sample size
represent the value to verify
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true mean for this case is 46.7, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Since we know the population deviation the statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing we got:
The p value would be given by:
For this case since th p value is lower than the significance level of0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is significantly different from 46.7 MPG