I would think either the Indians or cavemen
The organisms in the Cretaceous period and Permian Period are now extinct.
The emergence and demise of specific living forms are represented by time periods on the geologic time scale that span hundreds of millions of years. A mass extinction is a period of geologic time when a large number of plant and animal species go extinct, sometimes within a few thousand to a few million years.
Life has recovered after each of the five significant mass extinctions that have taken place during the past 500 million years. Because it led to the extinction of the dinosaurs, the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous Period is the most well-known. However, the Permian Period's end saw the most extreme one in terms of the number of species destroyed.
Know more about Cretaceous Period here
brainly.com/question/2093019
#SPJ1
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
The Coase theorem states that when transaction cost are low, two parties will be able to bargain and reach an efficient outcome in the presence of an externality.
The Coase Theorem also states that when conflicting property rights occur, bargaining between the parties involved will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of which party is ultimately awarded the property rights, as long as the transaction costs associated with bargaining are negligible. If trade in an externality is possible and there are no transaction costs, bargaining will lead to an efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property rights.
Answer:
For not receiving any financial help from the grantees, senator Kauffman hands were not tied neither was he unburdened or pressured by the outside forces to undermine the white collar crime investigations.
Step-by-step explanation
In the US the elites that is the political class, bankers and the individual funders do have influence over the State representatives due to their huge donations used in campaigns. In this case Senator Kaufman did not campaign but rather was appointed hence he did not receive any financial help from any third party, therefore his only commitment was to deliver the work he was appointed for.
This differs from other leaders because their allegiance is swayed as they try to please their donors for example; elected officials who received donations from NRA went against the bills that would limit their access to particular weapons.
