3rd Answer, narrated videotaping should not replace notetaking and photography completely, but rather be used alongside them.
Attachment and involvement in the social theory means the level of values that a person has in the society.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Social control hypothesis recommends that individuals' connections, duties, qualities, standards, and convictions urge them not to violate the law. In this way, if moral codes are disguised and people are integrated with and have a stake in their more extensive network, they will deliberately restrain their inclination to submit degenerate acts.
First, the elements of social control identified by Hirschi will be described. Hirschi's concept of "social bond" is comprised of the following four elements: (1) attachment, (2) commitment, (3) involvement, and (4) beliefs. Attachment refers to the symbiotic linkage between a person and society.
Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
The different benches in the parliament show the ruling of the ministers sitting on those benches.
Answer: Option 1.
<u>Explanation:</u>
There are different benches in the parliament. Different benches show different rulings. The benches which are in the front row are for the ministers which are important and have high rankings in the parliament. The ministers and the shadow ministers sit in the front row of the parliament.
The people who are not even the ministers or the shadow ministers sit in the back benches of the parliament or in the rows behind the rows of the front benches. A person who sits on the cross bench is the one from the independent or the minor party member.
Answer: they changed the law back when they made the prison asylum reform
Explanation:
