Answer:
<em><u>Infections of the scalp include bacterial infection of hair follicles (folliculitis), infestation of head lice (pediculosis capitis), and fungal infection of scalp ringworm (tinea capitis). Itching and excessive flaking of the scalp is seen with both dandruff (seborrheic dermatitis) and psoriasis</u></em>
<em><u>Ringworm. Ringworm is a fungal infection that causes a ring-shaped mark on the skin</u></em>
<em><u>Folliculitis. The hair on the body and the scalp grow out of hair follicles</u></em>
<em><u>Impetigo</u></em>
<em><u>Fungal infections</u></em>
<em><u>Seborrheic dermatitis</u></em>
<em><u>Scalp psoriasis</u></em>
<em><u>Lichen planus</u></em>
<em><u>Scleroderma</u></em>
Explanation:
Hope this helps:)
<u>Evidently, Dr. Waung is working within the "cognitive" perspective.</u>
The cognitive perspective is related about comprehension mental procedures, for example, memory, recognition, considering, and critical thinking, and how they might be identified with conduct.
The cognitive perspective is concerned about "mental" capacities, for example, memory, recognition, consideration, and so forth. It sees individuals as being like PCs in the manner in which we process data (e.g., input-process-yield). For instance, both human brains and PCs process data, store information and have input a yield technique.
The answer is "<span>It was a subtle way to make participants feel more or less confident."
</span>
When the arguments were solid, individuals who gestured or nodded their heads concurred with them more than individuals who shook their heads, on the grounds that the head nodders had more trust in the solid contentions that they heard, But when contentions were frail, head gesturing had the contrary impact, it gave individuals more certainty that the contentions they heard were powerless, making them less persuading.Thus we conclude from this that anything you can do to influence individuals to have more trust in your message will make it more compelling, as long as your contentions are solid.
Answer:
Passive Destructive Response
Explanation:
Passive Destructive Response is the response where a the receiver shows no interest in what the sender is saying. The topic of discussion is completely changed by the receiver and the message is completely ignored.
Here, it can be seen that Sheldon completely ignores what Amy has said.
Hence, this is an example of Passive Destructive Response.
Answer: The policy of local governance and corporate budgetary by the local people lead to the eventual decentralization of powers. Furthermore after World War II the entire empire got dismantled in Asia and Africa.
