.Answer:
1- Napoleon people trusted him because he was a strong leader and mostly did what he promised.
2- In movies the conflict is very often that one person wants to keep something a secret e.g a disease or maybe cheating; when the secrets come out everything goes downhill.
3- Brexit: many people don't support the government as much because it keeps being put off.
4- In the book The boy in the striped pajamas Bruno's father doesn't tell Bruno about what his real work is which causes fatality.
I believe the lines are:
"<span>Not longer he tarried,
But one night after continued his slaughter
Shameless and shocking,</span><span> shrinking but little</span>
<span>From malice and murder; they mastered him fully."
So, Grendel is not an ordinary human being. In fact, he is not human after all, but a murderous, villainous monster that defies both men's and God's laws. His slaughter is not a monstrous element - after all, people did it too, especially warriors. What illustrates him as a monster are the words "shameless and shocking, shrinking but little from malice and murder". The epic world of "Beowulf" couldn't possibly be shocked by an "ordinary" murder or any act of violence. What makes Grendel's murders shameless shocking is the fact that he doesn't commit them because it needs to be done. He commits them simply because he can, and enjoys greatly in it, even devouring the corpses afterwards.</span>
When something is dark, it is usually evil. Evil things do not really have a kind heart, so this is ironic because when something is evil, it doesnt have a kind heart, but in this phrase, darkness has a heart.
The lessons that Orwell learns as a result of his experience with the elephant is option C: He realizes that imperialism can lead people to act against their own values.
Explanation:
Shooting an elephant is a symbolic story, which shows the attack towards imperialism. Orwell tries to say that imperialism benefits neither the imperialists or the countries that they try to colonise.
This story draws a parallel between imperialism and with him shooting the elephant,
He shoots the elephant because the people ask him to shoot it. He did it despite his better judgement ,and because of his action he suffered, seeing the painful death of the elephant.
This story draws a parallel with imperialism, as it shows that often the leaders are controlled by the masses as they much as they control the masses likewise, Orwell had to shoot the elephant because he was expected by the locals to do so.
I think the best similarities of the two of them is that both writers wrote about things and events that are going on in their country and the comparison of them is that American writer wrote about war, racism and slavery, and politics in a current time while European writer are all about religions. I hope this would help
