Answer:
1. If it were blm protesters, there would've been shoootings, deaths, tear gas, police officers punching and kicking protesters because the way America views and treats black people, minorities, and poc. They are treated as such that their life doesn't matter and white people are superior and more important.
2. The impact of yesterday's event at the capital proves that white privilge is real. They practically walked into the capital. The difference between that and blm protests is blm supporters are fighting for racial injustice and the trump supporters who raided and destroyed the capital are throwing tantrums cause trump lost. Especially the fact that the president of the US ENCOURAGED them to destroy and raid the capital. And many important people were inside and could've been killed like Mike Pence for instance. He put his on VP in danger. And the trump supporters at the capital were breaking the law by breaking in, smashing desks, stealing mail (which is fraud btw), and be all kinds of violent for what? because trump lost. And they only got treated a fraction of what blm supporters would've been treated
3. No i completely disagree with the methods of the "protesters" at the capital. They werent even protesters. They were criminals and rioters. Breaking the law. There are many other ways they could've done it. They could've simply had a peaceful protest like many BLM supporters did.
Explanation:
The Similarities, <span>Both Buddhism and Hinduism share a strong belief in reincarnation; an endless cycle of births and deaths that must be broken.Attachment to people, places, things, or even ideas can lead to suffering; therefore, it’s best to practice non-attachment in the sense that you’re more anchored in your center than in outer circumstances.Meditation is highly regarded in both religions, because they believe real truth and spirituality is inward, not outward.Both believe that everything on the planet will eventually achieve enlightenment and liberation.</span>The
Differences, <span>Buddhism has no “rituals” in the traditional sense. They don’t do elaborate prostrations or pujas (prayer rituals). There are not even priests, really; though they do have senior monastics.Hinduism has an entrenched caste system (though it can be argued it was never meant to be that way), where as Buddhism does not. Buddhists believe that anyone can achieve enlightenment, where Hindus believe you must be of the Brahmin caste.In many sects of Hinduism, it’s believed extreme asceticism is the ideal spiritual life. In Buddhism, the middle path is best. Neither extreme poverty nor extreme wealth are considered to be ideal.Traditional Buddhism has no gods, where as Hinduism has literally endless variations and incarnations of gods and goddesses. Although many Hindus believe Buddha is an incarnation of Vishnu, Buddhists do not usually share that view.<span>Buddha taught that the original Vedas (ancient religious texts) were originally sacred until animal sacrifice was introduced.</span></span>
Hey, that's a great essay prompt. It often happens that when threatened by some threat to our way of life in a democracy, we respond in very undemocratic ways. During the McCarthy years, people's privacy was invaded as accusations about communists and communist sympathizers were aimed at all sorts of people. Many people in the Hollywood film industry were targeted during that time, for instance. But defenders of freedom (including film and television people) fought back against that. We must always adhere to our primary aims as a society -- the rights and liberties of each individual. We don't want to get into "witch hunts" where we suspect our neighbors of evil for no good reason.
Speaking of "witch hunts," the playwright Arthur Miller wrote a really powerful play in 1953, during the Cold War, which focused on the Salem witch trials. He was making the point that what was happening in the McCarthy era (hunting for communists) was another manifestation of the witch-burning craze that had happened at a previous time in history.
Answer:
B. The U.S. military did not have experience fighting in jungles.