That which we call a rose by another name would smell as sweet.
I hope this helps! :)
Based on the passage, it can be inferred that the author assumes that the reader is a generalist who needs an explanation of specialized concepts.
From the complete information, it can be deduced that the passage is excerpted from an educational article that's promoting the awareness of a critical scientific issue.
Therefore, the author assumes that the reader is a generalist who needs an explanation of specialized concepts. This was illustrated as the scientific concepts were explained.
Learn more about passages on:
brainly.com/question/15179003
Answer:
I don't get your question.
Explanation:
Explanation:
Since it it a parody I will write you something that the most people understand.
Study: 90 percent of people are not actually allowed to have their own opinion
Those are the breaking news. Nowadays people are not having permission to have their own opinion on something since everyone are knowing better than them what is going on in their lives. Now the law had confirm it, people can do their gossip without feeling guilty. Today at school, Anne had asked her friend ''What is your opinion on my new dress?'' and her friend replied ''I don't like it. The dress has the colors that I don't like, yellow and purple.''
Anne said ''I guess that you are right. Those were my two favorite colors but since I could not have my own opinion I will take yours''
The next day, Anne came in school dressed in all black. Her friend told her ''You look better now'' but everyone was thinking that someone had died in her family so they were acting sad around her.
The correct answer is C. Observing what happened to the Spartans and the Romans shows that it is best to destroy a newly acquired state that is accustomed to freedom.
Explanation:
The text focuses on explaining the differences between the Spartans and the Romans when conquering new territories. The author explains the Romans destroyed and dismantled new territories, and were successful. On the opposite, the Spartans were not successful because they only established a government in new territories.
This implies, destroying new states is a better strategy than allowing freedom, this is reinforced by the idea "he who becomes master of a city accustomed to freedom and does not destroy it may expect to be destroyed by it" that shows the need to destroy or dismantle new states to control them. Thus, the main idea is that destruction is the best strategy to use with acquired states which is proven by comparing Spartans and Romans.
