Answer:
Fundamental rights in India are the rights guaranteed under Part III (Articles 12-35) of the Constitution of India. There are six fundamental rights (Article 14 - 32) recognised by the Indian constitution : the right to equality (Articles 14-18), the right to freedom (Articles 19-22), the right against exploitation (Articles 23-24), the right to freedom of religion (Articles 25-28), cultural and educational rights (Articles 29-30) and the right to constitutional remedies (Article 32 and 226).[1]
While the Constitution also creates other rights, such as the Right to Property, they are not fundamental rights. In cases of fundamental rights violations, the Supreme Court of India can be directly petitioned under Article 32 of the Constitution. The Rights have their origins in many sources, including England's Bill of Rights, the United States Bill of Rights and France's Declaration of the Rights of Man.
Fundamental rights for Indians have also been aimed at overturning the inequalities of pre-independence social practices. Specifically, they have also been used to abolish untouchability and thus prohibit discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, gender or place of birth. They also forbid trafficking of human beings and forced labour (a crime). They also protect cultural and educational rights of religious establishments. Right to property was changed from fundamental right to legal right.
Answer: The explorer Christopher Columbus made four trips across the Atlantic Ocean from Spain: in 1492, 1493, 1498 and 1502. He was determined to find a direct water route west from Europe to Asia, but he never did. Instead, he stumbled upon the Americas. Though he did not really “discover” the so-called New World—millions of people already lived there—his journeys marked the beginning of centuries of exploration and colonization of North and South America.
Christopher Columbus was not the first person to propose that a person could reach Asia by sailing west from Europe. In fact, scholars argue that the idea is almost as old as the idea that the Earth is round. (That is, it dates back to early Rome.)
Explanation:
There are different kinds of theory. The doctrine of preemption stipulates that if a state tries to pass a law that conflicts within an area that has federal legislative jurisdiction it will be found unconstitutional.
<h3>What is the doctrine of preemption?</h3>
The doctrine of preemption is known to be a theory that is based on the Supremacy Clause. This state that the federal law will preempts state law, even though there is conflict arising due to the laws.
By the above, a federal court does need a state to stop some behavior it believes does interferes with, or may be in conflict with federal law.
Learn more about doctrine of preemption from
brainly.com/question/10270212
Answer:
The sentence that is true about the situation described in the paragraph is:
a. Monty can revoke the offer on Wednesday..
Explanation:
First, for understanding the reality of the situation, nobody of two: Monty or Benny, are legally forced to comply, because for that conversation be an "oral contract" is missing an important component:
- <u>Acceptance of the offer.</u>
When Monty offered his riding lawn mower to Benny, Benny doesn't accept the offer, by this reason, though Monty gave until Friday to decide to Benny, legally, if he finds a buyer on Wednesday, he can sell it, because there is not money for the object or acceptance intention.
Answer: Sociology examines the organization, structure, and change of social groups and institutions. It combines rigorous methods of inquiry and analysis in various areas of research, such as: mass media, the environment, racism, gender issues, class, and deviance and social control.
Explanation: