Answer:
Edgar
The amount he will owe on this debt in 2 years for quarterly compounding is:
= $7,387.28
Explanation:
Accumulated loan debt = $5,000
Interest rate per year = 20%
Period of loan = 2 years
Interest compounding = quarterly
From an online financial calculator:
N (# of periods) 8
I/Y (Interest per year) 20
PV (Present Value) 5000
PMT (Periodic Payment) 0
Results
FV = $7,387.28
Total Interest $2,387.28
I believe the answer is:
- What can go wrong?
This question is asked to find out the potential risk that may occur after purchasing the product.
- What is the likely return?
This question is asked to find out potential benefit from consuming the product
-Is the risk worth the return?
<span>The purchase should be made only if the potential benefit would outweigh potential risk
</span>
Answer:
Income will increase by $5 per unit
Explanation:
The income effect in case of the order accepted is presented below:
As we know that
Additional sales per unit $32
Direct material per unit $12
Direct labor per unit $9
And, the incremental variable overhead cost is $6 per unit
Since the fixed cost is the same so it does not affect the effect on income
So, the income effect would be
= $32 - $12 - $9 - $6
= $5 per unit
Since the answer comes in positive which means there is an increase in income
Answer: The correct answers are,
A)Civil Engineer 5)designs and oversees a large construction
process
B)Logging Equipment Manager 6categorizes trees based
on their knot size, straightness, and other characteristics
C)Energy Auditor 4)reduces the amount of energy homeowners and companies use
Explanation:
Answer:
An exception based on public policy.
Explanation:
Employment at will according to the United States is a doctrine that permits the employer and employee to work together in an indefinite period of time, whereas they are able to terminate their contract with any necessary fair clause.
In many counties around the world, employers always look for reasons to terminate or stop their employees from working, whereas an exception based on public policy negate this doctrine.