Answer:
In a common law jurisdiction, the property that the defendant is guilty of larceny is the lawnmower.
Explanation:
Larceny or theft is the intentional possession of someone's property for the purpose of permanently depriving the owner of its use. The property may be the person's identity, intellectual property, services, and personal property. Though the automobile was totally ruined, the neighbor did not initially intend to dispossess the owner of the car. But he intended to dispossess the owner of the lawnmower since he was about to trade it in for a new one, which will belong to him and not the former owner.
The statements accurately describe key compromises reached at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 :
The Three-Fifths Compromise established that the population of enslaved people in a state would be only partially represented in that state’s official population.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, established that Congress would be composed of one house in which representation was based on a state’s size and one in which every state was represented equally.
Option : B and C.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Constitutional Convention is a major event that took place in 1787. It decided that how America will be governed in future days. Moreover, it ratified by all the 13 states and resulted in three major compromises. They are Three-Fifths compromise, Great compromise, and Electoral College.
Firstly, the Great compromise ended the issue between the states regarding the representation of members in both houses.
Secondly, the Three-Fifths made the enslaved person's representation to be calculated as three-fifths of the white person in the House of representatives.
Finally, the electoral college resolved how the president can be elected.
A government allows its people to govern themselves. <3
Answer:
Fair and effective governance is critical to ensuring that development benefits both people and the planet. Governance should entail processes, decisions, and outcomes that sustain natural resources alleviate poverty and improve the quality of life.
Explanation:
Answer:
No, it would not be legal.
Explanation:
It would be a violation of US law if Congress allowed a United States territory to become a complete state on the condition that its residents choose a new governor. This is because the US Federal Congress is prohibited from limiting the independence, sovereignty and management of a state over its territories. Thus, allowing a territory to become a complete state is a way of limiting state political power within that territory, which means that it is illegal.
