1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Luden [163]
3 years ago
7

A police officer responds to a call about a young person with a gun sitting on a park bench. Upon arriving at the park in his cr

uiser, the officer tells him three times to “show your hands.” The young person did not show his hands and may have reached toward his belt. Within two seconds of arriving, he was shot and killed by the police officer. The young person turns out to be 12 years old and the gun turns out to be a toy. Is this a justifiable use of force by the officer? Explain your answer.
Law
1 answer:
stich3 [128]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: I would suggest looking at the Tamir Rice and Tyre King cases. Most of the 911 calls describe them as men with guns, and don't indicate an age. Now police officers don't have the luxury of knowing whether or not a gun is fake, and that's why it's a dangerous job. In both cases, the 911 operator failed to mention that these "guns" these young boys were carrying might be fake, and that they are most likely juveniles, so their was a miscommunication there that could've saved someone's lives. In regards to the Tamir Rice's case, the fatal shot that killed Rice was shot within seconds of the officers arriving on the scene. Why wouldn't an officers first instinct not be to neutralize a suspect non-lethally? These are hard questions and answers. Now parents fear that if there child is seen playing with a toy gun outside then they may be shot and killed. I guess by law they replica guns are indistinguishable and if an officer fears for their lives it's justified. Personally, I think it isn't it's very clear looking at Tamir Rice he is a child!!! I think deadly force should be a last result, and for them to pull a gun on him without evaluating the scene makes me think it had more to do with racial stereotyping more than anything.

You might be interested in
Why should there be laws against the use of cell phones while driving?
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

to protect us

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mr. Lynn, an agent for Acme Insurance, Inc. thinks that, since state laws are preempted concerning the marketing of Medicare hea
n200080 [17]

What might you, as his colleague, advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is: d. Organizations sponsoring Medicare health plans are responsible for the behavior of their contracted representatives and will be conducting monitoring activities to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal law and guidance and plan policies. Furthermore, state agent licensure laws are not preempted and he must abide by their requirements.

<h3>What is medicare?</h3>

A medicare can be defined as a health insurance coverage that help to cover medical expenses.

Based on the given scenario what  you might  advise him concerning the type of scrutiny he will be under is that company that is incharge of the medicare plan are the one incharge of the representatives behavior.

Therefore the correct option is D.

Learn more about medicare here:brainly.com/question/1960701

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
Define the Marbury vs. Madison case
KIM [24]

Answer:

The U.S. Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the principle of judicial review—the power of the federal courts to declare legislative and executive acts unconstitutional. The unanimous opinion was written by Chief Justice John Marshall

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burde
BigorU [14]

I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.

<h3>Who is a Defendant?</h3>

This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.

It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ  the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.

Read more about Defendant here brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
4 merits of a one party system???<br> And demerits
Ivahew [28]

Answer:

Here is ur answer

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • There are
    11·1 answer
  • Under the Driver Responsibility Program (DRP), a driver accumulates ___ points for every traffic conviction which does not resul
    14·2 answers
  • What is the role of local and state governments in the law making process?​
    15·2 answers
  • Which branch of government does the cartoonist suggest is the most powerful?
    5·1 answer
  • THE MONKEY'S PAW <br> ESCAPE ROOM code
    5·2 answers
  • What is Pythagorean theorem,
    5·2 answers
  • According to the segment, which of the following interviewing techniques is NOT recommended when interviewing juveniles?
    15·1 answer
  • What do points do? sorry im new.
    8·2 answers
  • ¿Cuáles son las dificultades con que tropiezan los indígenas en la actualidad? <br><br><br> Ayuda!!!
    10·1 answer
  • What questions must the court answer? Make sure to address the specific law, act, or amendment?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!