1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Snezhnost [94]
2 years ago
15

Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?

Law
1 answer:
kkurt [141]2 years ago
6 0

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

You might be interested in
Which of the following best describes the image and its creator?
Lena [83]

Answer:

2 I believe its 2 but Ii could be wrong

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10 When your ability to divide your attention is impaired, the chances of being involved in a collision increase. A BAL as low a
Black_prince [1.1K]
.08 is the legal BAC
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The concept of enforcement districts or precincts was contributed by whom?
Verizon [17]

The concept of enforcement districts or precincts was contributed by whom?

Ans: Romans

7 0
2 years ago
Would it be legal for congress to allow a territory of the united states to become a full state on condition that its residents
dolphi86 [110]

Answer:

No, it would not be legal.

Explanation:

It would be a violation of US law if Congress allowed a United States territory to become a complete state on the condition that its residents choose a new governor. This is because the US Federal Congress is prohibited from limiting the independence, sovereignty and management of a state over its territories. Thus, allowing a territory to become a complete state is a way of limiting state political power within that territory, which means that it is illegal.

6 0
3 years ago
Neal, a twelve-year-old, buys a pair of skis from Outdoor Outfitters (OO), telling the salesperson that he has never been skiing
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer:

OO could use the defense that they gave advice but it was rather the action of the boy that caused the accident not the other way around.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Procedural due process requires that any taking of a person's life, liberty, or property by government must be made equitasbly,
    9·1 answer
  • The additional standard for age 65 and older or blind
    8·1 answer
  • Tell of the Supreme Court's responsibility in interpreting the Constitution -- in other words, why does the U.S. Constitution pl
    14·1 answer
  • How should<br>we utilize our<br>rights?​
    14·1 answer
  • "prison is too expensive and doesn't work , present a case for and against this statement "
    11·1 answer
  • What do you believe caused Manson to become a criminal?
    9·1 answer
  • The principles evolved by the courts in England in interpreting statutes are adopted and applied with local
    15·1 answer
  • • J20P13Q3 Explain how the system of precedent
    15·1 answer
  • Defendant<br> What do they want to happen in Obergefell v. Hodges
    11·1 answer
  • Citizens who give money to the ACLU expect the money to go toward what?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!