Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
yes it is im pretty sure
Answer:
With a correlation coefficient of 0.109 you can not be confident at all; this is about as close to a random guess you could get.
Step-by-step explanation:
Lines of best fit are used to try to make a correlation (relationship) about data that will either be positive (uphill), negative (downhill) or no correlation (points are scattered). Correlation coefficients based off of a line of best fit will fall between -1 and +1 where -1 would represent a perfect negative relationship and +1 would represent a perfect positive relationship. A correlation coefficient of 0 would indicate that there is no relationship. So, if your data shows a correlation coefficient of 0.109, which is closest to 0 on a number line, then you can't be sure that your data has a very close relationship.
Assumption:
<em>Something is missing in question. If we see deeply it is apparent that there is some issue with option b i.e. </em><em>B) 8 − 4x 10 = 4 + 2x </em><em>we assume that the questioner want to type </em><em>B) 8-4x^10 = 4 + 2x.</em>
Answer:
The correct answer is <em> </em><em>B) 8-4x^10 = 4 + 2x.</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
All equations given is the question can be solve easily to determine the value of x. However if we solve equation mentioned in option b we cannot get single answer easily.
For example value of x in eq given in option A
15x + 123 = 5x+4
1oX = -119
X = -119/10
Answer:y=-2x+0
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
0.0656
Step-by-step explanation:
For each message, we have these following probabilities:
90% probability it is spam.
10% probability it is legitimate.
Compute the probability that the first legitimate e-mail she finds is the fifth message she checks:
The first four all spam, each with a 90% probability.
The fifth legitimate, with a 10% probability.
