Will give BRAINLIEST
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Explanation: To graph the equation y = x - 2, the idea is simple.
We pick three values for <em>x</em>, plug them into the
equation, and find the corresponding values for <em>y</em>.
In order to do this in an organized way, we set up a chart.
Down the left side we make a column for our x's, down the right side we make a column for our y's, and in the middle we make a column for the side of the equation that contains the <em>x</em>, in this case, x - 2.
So reading the chart from left to right, we have our <em>x</em> or what we plug into the equation, then we have the x - 2 or what happens to the x when we plug it into the equation, and finally we have our <em>y</em> or what we end up with after plugging <em>x</em> into the equation.
So our first step in filling out the chart is choosing
the x's that we want to plug into the equation.
When graphing lines, I always choose three x's,
a positive number, zero, and a negative number.
The easiest numbers to pick are usually 1, 0, and -1.
So for 1, we plug a 1 into the equation for <em>x</em>
and we have y = (1) - 2 or -1
For 0 we plug a 0 into the equation for <em>x</em>
and we have y = (0) - 2 or -2.
For -1 we plug a -1 into the equation for <em>x</em>
and we have y = (-1) - 2 or -3.
So our points are (1, -1), (0, -2), and (-1, -3).
I looked at the x and y column to find those points.
Since our domain is all real numbers, we can connect these points based on the pattern that they are forming on the graph which is a line.
Answer:
No, They are not equivalent
Step-by-step explanation:
The two expressions are only said to be equivalent if they are the same regardless of whatever value the variable(s) is.
The variable in this question is x.
To prove this, we equate both expressions:
This shows that they have the same value ONLY when x is 1.
This is why Andre says that they are equivalent, but they are not.