If you multiply length times width to get area, it's the same with division. You do area divided by length or width. The equation would be 225 divided by 13 3/4. 225/13 3/4= 16.36 inches. 16.36 > 16 inches, so the answer would be no. (The mirrors length and width are 13 3/4 inches by 16 9/25)
1. 2/7
2. 2/15
3. 5/24
4. 2/11
What they said^ lolllllllllll
Given the slope, m = -2/3, and the x-intercept, (3,0):
Use these values and plug into the slope-intercept form to solve for the y-intercept, b:
y = mx + b
0 = -2/3(3) + b
0 = -2 + b
Add 2 to both sides to isolate b:
0 + 2 = -2 + 2 + b
2 = b
Now that we have our slope, m = -2/3, and the y-intercept, 2
The linear equation in slope-intercept form is:
y = -2/3x + 2
Please Mark my answers as the Brainliest, if you find this helpful :)
Answer:
B., E.
Step-by-step explanation:
what was the difficulty ? this is just to understand the movement of a thrown rock.
what happens, when you throw a rock through the air ? it will first move up a little bit, reaches a maximum height, and then drops down again.
that is what the graphic shows.
so, can A. be correct ? no. as we move from 0 seconds to the right (time passes) the height of the rock increases first (before decreasing again later on).
can C. be correct ? no, it would mean that the function would look the same on both sides of the x-axis. this is clearly impossible.
can D. be correct ? no, nowhere in the graph is the height (= the functional value, the y to the x) negative.
can F. be correct ? no, we clearly see the maximum height at 1.5 seconds. at 3 seconds the height is actually at its minimum.
