1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ierofanga [76]
2 years ago
8

5. What time signature is this song in? How do you know? 00:23 03:28

Arts
1 answer:
Ivanshal [37]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A song with a time signature of 4/4 has four beats in a measure, and is counted like this: 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4, etc. By far, 4/4 is the most common time signature you'll run into. In fact, 4/4 is so common that it is often called common time.

The time signature is written at the beginning of the staff after the clef and key signature. Time signatures consist of two numbers written like a fraction. The top number of the time signature tells you how many beats to count. This could be any number.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In classical tragedy, what characteristic does the hero often have?
Butoxors [25]

Answer:

C

the explanation is that i googled it so its correct and if it is mark me as brainless

7 0
3 years ago
Identify and describe each example of michelangelo’s art
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

Euthyphro

Sophist and religious scholar of Athens

Euthyphro opens with the argument that 'Good is what is Holy'. He argues that sentient beings (people) are flawed and make bad judgments, whereas Gods are superior and possess far more wisdom than us; therefore what they command must be good. This can be refuted by pointing out that there are many different Gods, each of whom have different ideas of what is Good, thus making the Gods impossible to use as a source of morality.

Euthyphro's next argument is that what all the Gods agree upon is good. For example, most deities agree that it is wrong to kill a man without a cause. By asking Euthyphro to back this up you can cause the thinker to spout the same circular argument that the non-virtual Socrates did by posing to him the Euthyphro dilemma: 'What the Gods Agree Upon is Always Good' vs. 'If Things are Good, the Gods Will Agree on Them'. This demolishes Euthyphro's argument as it is shown that in order for what the Gods command to benefit mankind, the actions they command must have value rooted externally.

Protagoras

Sophist of Athens

Protagoras argues that 'The Source of Morality is the Self'. His reasoning for this is a simple logical elimination. The conversation with Euthyphro has already proven that morality doesn't come from the Gods, while Protagoras believes it unlikely that morality could come from rocks and trees, because, as a system that governs the actions of humans, it makes little sense that it would originate from our surroundings. This leads him to the idea that 'Morality is up to the Individual' as the only possible remaining option; an assumption that you point out to be flawed as there is always the possibility that alternatives have been overlooked.

Protagoras goes on to declare that there is nothing upon which everyone can agree and 'Whatever an Individual Believes to be Right is Right', which he backs up by saying that people disagreed on most issues in Athenian Democracy, and that there were even those who argued that 'Those who Speak out Should be Put to Death'. This is easily rebutted as you claim that in extreme cases such as these, the values of an individual can indeed be wrong. The evidence for this is that if Free Speech was punished, Science and Philosophy would be no more and society would cease to advance; thus morality can't be determined entirely by the individual.

Protagoras is then forced to put forth that 'All Morals are Subjective', meaning that they are dependent on situation. While it is agreed that this is an interesting thought, it acknowledges that there are factors other than the individual that affect morality, undermining his entire philosophy.

Thomas Hobbes

Political Philosopher and Author of Leviathan

Hobbes' reasoning is based upon his premise of 'The Natural Condition of Mankind', the substance of which is that men are selfish and in competition for the resources necessary for survival. This creates a 'Constant State of War' with all other men and in such a state there is no morality. Of course, this explains very little in terms of the complex societies that we live in today and can be refuted by simply remarking that people often work together in order to further the overall good in the world. For example, builders working together to build a house or philosophers working together to find the truth.

Hobbes affirms this, stressing that, despite there being no morality in the state of nature, it is our sense of morality that allows us to co-operate in such a fashion. He claims that this sense of morality is born through 'The Social Contract'. Hobbes supports this by offering that since the natural state is an extremely uncomfortable way of living, with no assurance of man's most fundamental self-interest of survival, mankind is impelled to seek peace through the formation of social contracts between individuals, each agreeing to give up some of our personal freedoms, most notably our freedom to harm, in exchange for greater security. This seems to be somewhat of a contradiction in that the theory is based upon the idea that mankind is selfish and will go to any lengths to improve their own prosperity. As the only benefits of the social contract originate from others giving up their rights, if people are as selfish as he claims, what is there to stop individuals from breaking a contract to seek the most advantageous situation; to keep their

Explanation:

this is more then you needed and may not even be what you need but i am sure you will end up useing it

3 0
3 years ago
L<br> What is the name of the piece above?
Lemur [1.5K]
That’s just a letter
7 0
2 years ago
In an artwork, the total effect of the combined visual qualities is known as the
Damm [24]
Form would be the correct answer
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following categories does the artwork fall?
ahrayia [7]

This piece of art would fall under the potrait category

Look at how this picture is similar to the one you are asking about.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the lekythos vase used for?
    10·2 answers
  • When will the new season of slugterra be out?
    13·1 answer
  • Who is regarded as the first important artist of the italian renaissance?
    7·2 answers
  • What was the favorite keyboard instrument of the romantic period?
    7·1 answer
  • Alana loves math, science, and anything having to do with logic. Even her doodles are uniform and structured. What role is most
    15·2 answers
  • Why was Marsden Hartley considered one of the forerunners of the Modern Art movement?
    12·1 answer
  • Por existe el mal si hay un dios
    8·1 answer
  • How did My Chemical Romance (the band) come together and fall apart?​
    6·2 answers
  • True or False: A finished project should have 2 different shapes.
    6·2 answers
  • What are native Russian adaptations of the central-dome churches in Byzantium
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!