Answer:
$62.9 and $98.4
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the cost of tennis shoe be x
Since a jacket cost $35.50 more than a pair of tennis shoe,
Then cost of jacket would be
= $35.50 + x
Total cost of both items would be;
x + $35.50 + x = $161.30
2x = $161.30 - $35.50
2x = $125.8
x = $62.9
Therefore, cost of pair of tennis shoe is $62.9
Jacket cost would now be
= $35.5 + x
= $35.5 + $62.9
= $98.4
Step-by-step explanation:
A list of all possible outcomes in a given event is:
Sample space
Answer: Dominant. The answer is dominant.
Answer:
If the cost of a fish for your aquarium costs $3 each, and you can spend no more than $27, then the inequality that would model this scenario would be: 3f≤27.
If we let f to be the number of fish you can buy, this inequality would directly translate to: three dollars times the number of fish you can buy is no greater than 27 dollars, which perfectly matches this scenario.
Let me know if this helps!