An analogy compares two things to show the similarities. We know how huge of an impact the printing press had during the Renaissance--all of a sudden it was much easier to get things printed, which made more people want to learn how to read. Before the printing press, only super rich people knew how to read because it was not important for lower classes to know--many things were spoken outloud as a way to give and get information. With the printing press, more people could get their hands on books or papers, which encouraged more people to learn how to read.
Computers have had a similar impact, which is why this is an analogy. Computers help more people get more information, because it is so much easier and faster to write things down, print them out, and send them. The same way the printing press helped information reach more people, computers do as much in this century to help more people get information faster and easier.
Answer:
The zero conditional is used to make statements about the real world, and often refers to general truths, such as scientific facts. In these sentences, the time is now or always and the situation is real and possible.
Example:
☞ if public transport is efficient, people stop using their cars.
Explanation:
<u>Hope </u><u>it </u>Helps
(Pa Brainliest Na din po)
I would say the second one- it sounds like a run on, but if you read them out loud, it's the one that sounds right. If you were to say the sentence, there's no sense in stopping and pausing your sentence after "bored". Honestly, they probably shouldn't have put the word "so" in either sentence because it doesn't flow well, but they probably did it that way to throw you off. The first one has an unnecessary pause, where the second one doesn't.
Good luck!!
