Answer:
go to jail
Explanation:
If you refuse a Breathalyzer test, you will most likely face serious consequences. For instance, if an officer stops you and believes you are intoxicated, and you refuse to submit to a test to determine your blood-alcohol concentration (BAC), you may risk having your license suspended or even face jail time.
While you may not be under arrest at this point, refusing a Breathalyzer may not be such a great idea as prosecutors may still base a potential DUI/DWI charge on other evidence collected at the scene, including officer observations, witness testimony, or the results of a field sobriety test. In certain jurisdictions, your refusal may be used against you in any possible trial. And some state laws distinguish between refusing a mobile Breathalyzer (which can carry a small penalty) and refusing a post-arrest blood, urine, or breath test at a police station or hospital (which can result in more severe penalties).
Nationwide females and African-Americans are the most frequent targets of corporal punishment in schools.
<h3 /><h3>What is Punishment?</h3>
Punishment is the response for some wrong doing. In a school punishments are common when pupil makes severe mistakes, pupil are warned and if they repeat the mistake.
Corporal punishment is the punishment in which the punished is hurt physically, this is generally not allowed in schools, but if this happens the most frequent target are females and African-Americans.
Teachers should not be allowed for this as this type of punishment demotivates the student.
Learn more about Punishment at brainly.com/question/27295567
#SPJ1
Answer:
Opening statements.
Explanation:
<u>Opening statements</u>, like the name suggests, <u>are the starting statements that narrate the events of the case and what's involved</u>. The prosecutor and the defense team will both present their opening statements, though the defense team is not normally required to do so.
During a trial, these opening statements by both parties will provide the jury and the others present in court the outline of the major events, objectives of their teams in the case. This will provide them the time to present the evidence, the witnesses t be called, and the objectives of the parties in each trying to prove their case.
Thus, the correct answer is opening statements.
1. yes. like the jim crow laws. they discriminated against african americans and made things very unfair. it was completely legal, but not moral at all. it’s very inhuman to treat others like that
2. yes. like helping a holocaust victim escape or hide from the nazi’s. it was illegal but people wanted to do it to help and protect them
This is tricky but I would go with generally, yes.
Side note: However, I feel like that would have some major consequences!^
