It is alliteration because it’s repeating .
Answer:
Afrika's ransom in the book is amounted to $200.
Explanation:
"True North" is a novel written by Kathryn Lasky. The novel is about two girls, Lucy and Afrika, from two distinctive worlds, embarking on a journey together.
Afrika is a nineteen year old slave runaway girl. In Chapter 19, when Afrika was hiding with the Hunns, her former owner, Jenk Thomas had a bill published, claiming a reward of two-hundred dollars to the one who will hand Afrika over to him.
So, the ransom amounted to $200 on Afrika in the book.
ok fenneezzzyyy ok. ok ok ok
Answer and Explanation:
It has only been a couple of months since the Green Prairie opened on ... Street, and it has already divided our city. On the one hand, there are those who love it. On the other, well, you get the picture. So I decided I needed to see (or taste) it for myself.
My first impression was good. The place has a tranquil atmosphere created by the dim lights, the darker color palette, and the sound of water flowing down glass windows. Beautiful! But then, as soon as I served the first dish, I was disappointed. The chef is said to be quite experienced and acclaimed. Perhaps knowing that raised my expectations a bit. Unfortunately, my steak was undercooked and cold. I told the waiter about it and asked him if they could cook it just a bit more. He was very polite - no complaints here. However, what he brought back was nothing but charred meat. I could see he was utterly embarrassed. It turns out the famous chef does not like it when costumers complain and, if food is sent back to the kitchen, he will make a point of ruin it. I only found out about that the next day, after having experienced his arrogance myself. Therefore, I would not recommend the Green Prairie restaurant.
Note: There is more than 100 words above, so feel free to edit it.
Hamlet, according to his discussion with Horatio in scene 1 page 9 favors death as an agent of freedom and equality.
Notice the inference he draws using Alexander the Great:
<em />
<em>Hamlet: </em><em>...isn't it possible...that the remains of Alexander the Great could be used to patch a hole in a barrel?</em>
<em />
<em>Horatio: </em><em>If you thought that, you'd be overthinking</em>
<em />
<em>Hamlet</em><em>: ...just follow the logic: Alexander dies, he is buried, and returns to dust. The dust is dirt, and dirt makes </em><em>mud</em><em> which we use to patch holes. Tell me why it is impossible that we might have used some dirt which used to be </em><em>Alexander?</em><em>....</em>
<em>The great emperor </em><em>Ceasar,</em><em> dead and turned to </em><em>clay</em><em>, may plug up a hole to keep the wind away...</em>
<em />
Hamlet's logic is simple. All men (great or small) are destined to die. But he employs the imagery of mud and dirt to further drive home the notion that if the bodies of the greats decayed and turned to dirt, as well as those of the poor and nameless, then death was indeed an equalizer.
Learn more about Hamlets No Fear in the link below:
brainly.com/question/484119
