1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wewaii [24]
3 years ago
6

Cuales son las consecuencias de las expresiones identitarias irreversibles

History
1 answer:
goldenfox [79]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

When asked what would be the most negative consequences of irreversible expressions in relation to the family, the following were mentioned: change in tradition, disorganization of the family, separation from the family and "loss of ideas", the death of relatives on the way north and the increase in violence.

You might be interested in
How does power determine access and opportunity?
Igoryamba

Answer:

Explanation:

Equal opportunity, also called equality of opportunity, in political theory, the idea that people ought to be able to compete on equal terms, or on a “level playing field,” for advantaged offices and positions.

5 0
3 years ago
Nixon won reelection in 1972.<br> a. True<br> b. False
Oksana_A [137]

True Nixon Did Win Reelection In 1972


8 0
4 years ago
What did the aristocracy, rich landowners, do that allowed them to take power away from the King?
krok68 [10]

Answer:

By building pressure on the king.

Explanation:

The aristocracy, rich landowners, do that allowed them to take power away from the King is the nobility in the society and popularity among the people. They are very powerful due to high amount of wealth and the name of their forefathers which work very hard for the prosperity and development of the country. So by using their name, their popularity and wealth they take away the power from the king by building pressure on it.

3 0
3 years ago
The __ test measures sheathed an action of the government achieves a fair purpose
Talja [164]

Your answer would be c.

7 0
4 years ago
Which amendment to the u.s. constitution states: no persons shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, u
drek231 [11]
Hi there!

The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution concerns the right to trial and includes the phrase "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury". This Amendment, which is part of the Bill of Rights, ensures that Americans can not be held accountable for a crime without a fair and speedy trial involving a grand jury.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did George Pickett fail to protect Five Forks when Sheridan attacked it?
    6·2 answers
  • What addition to the U.S. Constitution was suggested as a way to win the approval of many of its opponents?
    6·1 answer
  • Who was joohn adam child
    15·2 answers
  • Use the following excerpt taken from an abolition speech delivered by William Wilberforce to answer the question below:
    6·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    9·2 answers
  • How did Louis XIV deal with the Huguenots?
    11·2 answers
  • On what type of landform do most of the people of East Asia and Southeast Asia live?
    5·1 answer
  • What is one example of bureaucracy in our society
    8·1 answer
  • Women, blacks, and ________ who worked in factories typically earned the lowest wages. a. Nativists c. citizens b. immigrants d.
    6·1 answer
  • 1. Name three things that helped the movement<br> begun by Luther to spread across Europe.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!