Basically the more romans = stronger empire bc if there were more romans it would be harder to attack rome/conquer it. there were more people exposted to roman culture, allowing it to be spread all over and expand the empire
The colonial boundaries created countries where they did not exist, separated tribal groups in many cases, and often brought
Between 1881 and 1911, the entire African continent (with few exceptions) was conquered by seven European countries. The indigenous peoples found themselves integrated into the political and economic structures created by the European colonizers, finding themselves subjected to them.
The elites of indigenous peoples (such as tribal leaders) enjoyed some advantages, such as some social positions, but Africans were generally excluded from political decisions. Finally, colonialism led to an impoverishment also in cultural terms, as well as an impossibility of political independence of the territory.
Learn more about the colonization of Africa in brainly.com/question/42547
Answer:
<em>(A) Scholars who once thought Native American literature's were solely oral narratives
</em>
Explanation:
The question is not the relative pronoun-that-or idiom-either. It's more about modifying oral narratives and how it's combined with its modifier-recorded by.
You can't combine this modifier with its modified noun-narratives-with an and.
A. Scholars who once thought that Native American literature's were just oral narratives = <em>The modified noun sitting right next to its modifier is correctly modified.</em>
That France people helped with the Indians in the war.
