Go back and do your learning and try to get answers right then see the results, if you fail it then go back and do your leaning and then retry, and if you pass congrats man
D. Immigrants would work for less money due to their status in the country. Knowing that if minimum wage were a thing they would hire less risky individuals.
There are different kinds of rules. A commonly used test in a disparate impact case is the four-fifths rule which bases potential discrimination of a minority group relative to organization's hiring rate to be less than four-fifths of the hiring rate for the majority group.
<h3>What is the four-fifths rule?</h3>
There has been evidence of some discrimination if an organization's hiring rate for a minority group is said to be less than four-fifths of the hiring rate for the majority group.
The 4/5ths Rule is known to be a rule of thumb under which looks at the selection rate for any race, or ethnic group and has found it to be less than four-fifths (4/5th) or eighty percent (80%) of the known selection rate for the said group with the biggest selection rate.
Learn more about four-fifths rule from
brainly.com/question/6111641
All of the given practices can be effective in minimizing group harms.
Answer: Option E
Explanation:
As mentioned in the options, a collaborative review of the ongoing research by the Institutional Review Board can be taken from time to time during the course of the research to check whether the group of human samples is facing any adverse effects of the research or not.
A chalked plan promising the disclosure of the results of the research can also help in decreasing group harm. Moreover, consultation among the parties participated in research can also reduce the risk of group harm.
