1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivann1987 [24]
2 years ago
5

How did the rise of republicanism (small “r”) change the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches in the

colonies?
History
1 answer:
FrozenT [24]2 years ago
7 0

Republicanism is vital as it helps in the protection of the liberty of the citizens.

  • Through republicanism, there's a limit on the power of the federal government. It's vital in checkmating the power of the government.

  • Republicanism is among the principles of the Constitution of the United States government and it can be found in section 4 of the Constitution. It also explains that all the states in the country will be protected against invasion and against domestic violence through the application of the legislature.

In conclusion, the rise of republicanism was vital in changing the balance of power between government branches in the colonies.

Read related link on:

brainly.com/question/18987877

You might be interested in
Which statements accurately explain why the Renaissance began in the Italian city-states? Choose all answers that are correct. A
marshall27 [118]
I know its not B. so My answer is C. and A.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did conservative leaders react to nationalist movements in Europe in the nineteenth century?
DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

They were frightened by nationalist leaders and wanted to reduce their influence.

4 0
3 years ago
What are the challenges that scientists and archaeologists face in the search for the truth on the origin of man.
poizon [28]

Answer:

Beliefs and proof

Explanation:

In my opinion, one of the most hardest challenges that these scientists and Archaeologists face is proof. Is it really the truth? what do i believe? Some <em><u>believe</u></em> that humans originated in Africa over 1.9 million and 135,000 years ago. Note the fact '<em><u>believe</u></em>', have scientists proved this theory of evidence? NO. Do they have human witness of how they looked liked? NO.

All around us there are only theories and beliefs but never proof or evidence.

These are some very crucial factors these scientists face, to be able to actually make people think what they think, to try and convince that even though i may not have proof, our studies and reading are 'vastly' true.

Archaeologists main passion is to understand the past, to collect data and readings, to try and interpret hidden meanings... But have we gotten a conclusion? The origin of man is a very complicated subject. As a Christian i have different beliefs, like others will to.

This brings more frustration for scientists and archaeologists to make space for their beliefs too.

I hope this helps and i hope it cleared a bit of confusion, this is just my opinion.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following best describes the significance of the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803?
8_murik_8 [283]

D is the correct answer.

Marbury v. Madison set forth the idea of judicial review, that is, that courts have the power to review law and determine whether it is constitutional or unconstitutional.

6 0
3 years ago
Which two statements best describe the result of the Battle of Pea Ridge?
balandron [24]

The correct answer is 1.Confederate forces were forced to flee back into Indian Territory. This is correct, Brigadier General Arthur Pike was afraid that the Union would soon attack his Indian Territory command post at Fort Davis which is why he retreated to the Choctaw nation territory further south.

2.Confederate forces captured the supplies that were meant for Union troops. False, Southern guerillas did interrupt the supply lines for the Union Army but they were never able to capture their supplies. However if by supplies the question means materiel, then yes, it is correct that as some of the Union positions were overwhelmed by the Confederate attack they were forced to abandon several pieces of artillery and other kinds of materiel.

3.Union forces took over Fort Davis in Arkansas and built Fort McCulloch. False, union forces did not take over Fort Davies, they actually headed further south and captured Helena, Arkansas on July 12.

4.Union forces abandoned Fort Davis and moved back to Kansas. union forces were NOT concerned with Fort Davis.

5.Confederate forces defeated Union forces at Honey Springs. False, Union Forces prevailed.


3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What important concept of Judaism has spread to wedturn civilization
    6·1 answer
  • One reason france sent explorers to North America in the early 1500's was to
    9·1 answer
  • Match each event to the correct step in the decision-making process. 1. A woman is considering running for city council. Step On
    7·1 answer
  • During World War I, why was propaganda important for the war efforts?
    11·1 answer
  • Summary of dr kings speech I have a dream
    11·1 answer
  • which of the following describes a major motivation behind European explorations of the 15th century a. competition between mona
    9·1 answer
  • (LC) Why did fighting on the Western Front of World War I become a stalemate with high casualties but little progress? (1 point)
    9·1 answer
  • In which region are most of the cities of Brazil?
    14·1 answer
  • Arrange the events of the Cuban Missile Crisis in the correct sequence. Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev denied the existence of
    15·1 answer
  • Prior to 1800, the group that had the most impact on the Native Americans were the?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!