Answer:
Statement that best explains the difference in viewpoint in the Greenberg interview from that in the informational text on Thurgood Marshall is Option D: The Greenberg interview provides an insider's view of the Brown vs. Board of Education case; the perspective of the informational article is more distant.
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education case was a decision which set benchmark in Supreme Court of U.S. It ruled that the state laws which establish racial discrimination in public schools are unconstitutional.
Thurgood Marshall was an American lawyer in the Supreme Court of the United States. Other given option are incorrect. Greenberg gave personal knowledge of Thurgood Marshall and about the case but the informational article was only based on research.
Greenberg interview gave important details while article was based only on research.
Is there a question here that I could help you wuth
Deprived of life; no longer.
The three persuasive appeals that I have heard are:
<h3>What is Logos?</h3>
This refers to the persuasive appeal that makes use of logic to convince a person about a particular viewpoint.
Hence, we can see that the way I responded to logos when it was used on me was that I was convinced and as a result, acted, because he made use of sound logic.
Read more about persuasive appeals here:
brainly.com/question/3118369
#SPJ1
