The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The effect of the emphasis on loyalty to a group that had the revolutionary movement in the French people was precise that it strengthened the solidarity ties of the Frenchs who sought in that movement, and avenue to equity, liberty, and progress. It made the French people more united for a while, enduring the consequences of the movement, united. Yes, to French revolutionaries, the ideal of fraternity was just as important as the Enlightenment ideals of liberty and equality.
On the other hand, if we compared this French result to the American culture after its revolution, we can say that American colonists started to dive because of the formation of factions or political parties with divergent ideas that sometimes we're not the same as the ideas instituted by the founding fathers of the country. That is why President George Washington was not so fond of political parties.
<span>totalitarianism
</span><span>a system of government that is centralized and dictatorial and requires complete subservience to the state.</span>
<span>During World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union fought together as allies against the Axis powers. However, the relationship between the two nations was a tense one. Americans had long been wary of Soviet communism and concerned about Russian leader Joseph Stalin’s tyrannical, blood-thirsty rule of his own country. For their part, the Soviets resented the Americans’ decades-long refusal to treat the USSR as a legitimate part of the international community as well as their delayed entry into World War II, which resulted in the deaths of tens of millions of Russians. After the war ended, these grievances ripened into an overwhelming sense of mutual distrust and enmity. Postwar Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe fueled many Americans’ fears of a Russian plan to control the world. Meanwhile, the USSR came to resent what they perceived as American officials’ bellicose rhetoric, arms buildup and interventionist approach to international relations. In such a hostile atmosphere, no single party was entirely to blame for the Cold War; in fact, some historians believe it was inevitable.</span>
The answer would be (C.it indicated personal rank.)
