Answer:
No
Explanation:
That guy ( I won't say his name or they won't let me answer the question ) could have maybe even escaped or bribe some corrupt soldier and you never know if he had some weapons on him and what if he wanted to do a oof on purpose attack by exploding explosives
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.
Explanation
The difference between Andrew Jackson’s address to the Congress and Michael Rutledge’s “Samuel’s Memory” is clearly writing techniques and the use of language. Jackson’s sentences are long and very often not really to the point, which makes him sound very intelligent and believable. On the other hand, Rutledge uses short and simple sentences that are straight to the point.
Have been spelled out case-by-case by the supreme court.
I believe the answer to your question is: promoting company branding
<em>Hope you have a nice day! :)</em>
<span>The Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), Pub. L. 107-40, codified at 115 Stat. 224 and passed as S.J.Res. 23 by the United States Congress on September 14, 2001, authorizes the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the attacks on September 11, 2001.</span><span>
</span>
