Answer:
unethical but socially responsible.
Explanation:
Ethics is associated with conduct in the company's performance in its production and marketing process. Thus, if the company knows that there is misconduct by salespeople at work and does not take action to correct it, the company is being conniving and unethical.
Social responsibility consists of the performance of a company in actions aimed at improving the social / environmental conditions of society, but in which it has no direct connection with the company's performance. This is usually done on a voluntary basis. Thus, if this company makes charitable donations, even though it is not required to do so, it is a company concerned with society, this is characterized as social responsibility.
Answer:
Social media has not only changing the ways people communication, it also has ability to redistribute the power, especially among governments and citizens. Nowadays, with the development of social networking, the power of changing the world is not only the leaders, according to a study from HAVAS GLOBAL COMMS (2013), the single greatest “agent of change” is “the people, empowered by social media”. Social media effect on political sphere by shifting who controls the information, how to distribute that information and how it be changed.
Before the social media era, people are just passive accept the information from government, their opinions are not easy to express. In the traditional media world, it only can use mass media as the way to carry out one-to-many information. Corporations, governments or other groups controlled the information conveyed with laws or sometimes “simply by owning the means of distribution” (Bennett, 2011). The owner of the information has the ability to control what the information is transmitted and how the information is framed.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Plz give me brainliest thanks
The
Answer is false, because Rawls- Paradigmatic Shift: A Theory of Justice <span>
Rawls' goal: to replace intuitionism with a theory of
rational choice
Reject utilitarianism, which would leave individual rights
vulnerable and thus be irrational
Rawls' substantive theory: a well-ordered society is governed
by two principles
1. The equal liberty principle
2. The difference principle: social goods are to be
distributed equally unless some earn
Rawls' methodological contribution: Political theory can
validate universal norms.
His two principles are the rational choice of everyone who
accepts certain compelling assumptions in an Original Position like
• Humans seek autonomy
• Everyone is shrouded in a "veil of ignorance"
<span>• Everyone adopts a "maximin" conception of
rationality</span></span>
Answer:
uncountable noun. When there is law and order in a country, the laws are generally accepted and obeyed, so that society there functions normally. If there were a breakdown of law and order, the army might be tempted to intervene. ... people who had no respect for law and order.
Explanation:
Please Mark me brainlist and like
