<span>The phrase is an object phrase that depends on other information in order to make sense. If the phrase were alone, without a subject, then the information would be insufficient to derive any actual meaning. Clarifying questions would have to be asked, including "Who" or "What" won the award.</span>
The quotation "whether tis nobler in the spirit to suffer" is taken from Hamlet by William Shakespeare.
In Act 3, Scene 1, Hamlet laments the sadness and injustice of life: "To be or not to be? whether it is more respectable to endure the terrible misfortune rather than utilizing force to repel a sea of issues.
When Hamlet talks about<em> "the spears and arrows of astonishing fate,"</em> what does he mean?
The bad things that happen to us in life are likened by Hamlet to assaults by this personified version of "Fortune," who utilizes deadly weapons to fire at us. Shakespearean in origin, the phrase is "Slings and arrows of extraordinary fortune".
To learn more about Claudius here:
brainly.com/question/5798721
#SPJ4
Answer:
The actions might be damaging to attempts at pacification is explained below in details.
Explanation:
Pacification is an attempt to construct or preserve peace. That can mean satisfying an antagonistic nation through diplomacy or even simply by resolving a discussion. A pacifist is someone who is opposite fighting and combats. For many Americans, the phrase pacification is connected to the Vietnam War.
The subject is apple because it is the topic and the verb is have been grown because grown is an action verb and have been is present perfect but I think you do include that as part of a verb.
So the introduction paragraph would introduce the audience on what you're writing about. Like you could give your thoughts on it, etc. It would also introcude the main topics of your body paragraphs (kinda). The last sentence is either a transition or the Thesis.
Then there's a body paragraph, where you would focus on one thing and write about it. (For example, one body paragraph may be about glitches that self driving cars may have, etc). You would then cite a quote or use some form of evidence (from credible sites, don't use wikipedia lol.. also look at mla citations on purdue owl).
Next you would write a counter claim (I know it's confusing, but you write about something opposing your claims and such)... In this case, it could be about how self driving cars could be more accurate than human drivers, etc. If you want to go the extra mile, you could cite a quote in there ;) (mla format, go search it up on websites like Purdue owl).
Finally a conclusion, reflecting on what you have been writing about, etc.
(I made this guide really simple, as these prompts don't look like they ask for much, and arent as complicated compared to college level writing.)
