Answer:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
b. Their unborn child is not likely to be benefited by eliminating only one risk factor.
c. The unborn child might have been benefited if prenatal care were found, but improving prenatal nutrition is not important.
d. The health care and stress factors will only be important after the child is born.
In this example, the social worker is not able to help Robert and Nadine with all their problems. The couple still needs to find work and prenatal care. However, the social worker was able to help them find enough food to eat. Although the baby still faces some risks, the fewer risks, the better. Therefore, he is still better off than he was before thanks to the limited help of the social worker.
Other groups continually attacked them.
Answer: Object permanence
Explanation: Object permanence refers to the mental ability of a child to know or belief that an object continue to exist even when they can no longer be heard, seen or felt. At the very early stage of a child, they seem to belief that once an object can no longer be heard or seen, then such objects has seized to exist. Such that when an object is hidden from a child view or taken out of sight, they belief such object has disappeared because they lack the mental ability to realize that maybe the object was hidden or kept away from them.
