Answer:
Danny buys 13 candy canes for a party. He realizes he didn’t buy enough and buys 6 more. Danny then gives away 7 to his friend Sam. He heads back to the store because no one else biight candy canes and buys 9 times as many as he had left.
Hope this helps please give brainliest if you can!!
Answer:
Kenny is 18 years old Andrew is 10 years old Tim is 30 years old and Cameron is 5 years old
Step-by-step explanation:
Let a be Kenny's age , b be Andrew's age , c be Tim's age , d be Cameron's age
( b < a , b<c , d<b)
Kenny is 8 years older than Andrewn = > a = b + 8 (1)
Tim is 3 times as old as Andrew => c = 3 . b (2)
Cameron is 5 years younger than Andrew => d = b-5 (3)
The combined age of the four is 63 => a+b+c+d = 63 (4)
(1),(2),(3),(4) => b+8 + b + 3b + b-5 = 63 <=> 6b + 3 = 63 <=> b = 10
=> a= 10+8 =18, c = 3 . 10 = 30, d= 5
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
you need to simplify 8/20
8/20 can be put into the greatest common factor which is 4
then divide both sides by 4 this equals to 2/5
So yes they are
Answer:
yes
they are equivalent because lets say the X = 3 then you would have to answer
3 + 3 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 3
and that would = 19
and then on the other equation
5 x 3 + 4 = 19
So the both equal the same.
PLZ MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Answer:
z(c) = - 1,64
We reject the null hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
We need to solve a proportion test ( one tail-test ) left test
Normal distribution
p₀ = 63 %
proportion size p = 51 %
sample size n = 114
At 5% level of significance α = 0,05, and with this value we find in z- table z score of z(c) = 1,64 ( critical value )
Test of proportion:
H₀ Null Hypothesis p = p₀
Hₐ Alternate Hypothesis p < p₀
We now compute z(s) as:
z(s) = ( p - p₀ ) / √ p₀q₀/n
z(s) =( 0,51 - 0,63) / √0,63*0,37/114
z(s) = - 0,12 / 0,045
z(s) = - 2,66
We compare z(s) and z(c)
z(s) < z(c) - 2,66 < -1,64
Therefore as z(s) < z(c) z(s) is in the rejection zone we reject the null hypothesis
