Answer:
I guess in any location where ever it forms
Answer:
<em>Object permanence </em>
Explanation:
The permanence of the object is the understanding that objects continue to exist even if they cannot be seen, heard or, failing that, touched. The permanence of objects is studied by developmental psychology, which is a branch of psychology that is responsible for the study of the development of the social and mental capacities of babies and children.
It is not known exactly the moment in which the understanding of the permanence of the object is acquired, although it is estimated that it could arise within the first two years of life, although it is also thought that it is an innate or incorporated ability from the birth.
<em>Therefore, when imagining that he is sitting in the library and then a person is seen passing behind the pillar, and then emerges from the other side of a more distant pillar, there is talk of a clear example of permanence of the object, of which the Researchers create impossible scenarios to know if children have developed this capacity.</em>
It really depends on how you look at after the fight with Germany ended we were still fighting Japan but the U.S dropped 2 atomic bombs killing over 360,000 people they did it without telling the allies because they wanted to send a message to Russia basically saying that we have these types of weapons don’t mess with us basically a flex. After the bombs were dropped the war ended but I don’t believe justice was served because the U.S committed a war crime by dropping those bombs and they did it for research purposes because as soon as the war ended they sent over researchers to go collect data on what happened and how it effected the people. There is a lot more in depth stuff that will make my argument more strong but if I type all that out I will be here all day. Over all I don’t believe justice was served but that’s everyone’s own opinion.
Answer:
Psychological arousal is very simimal for several emotions, so it is not always reliable for the polygraph to distinguish one emotion reaction from another. For instance guilt from other reactions.
Explanation:
The polygraph can most certainly determine if a person is nervous or not, because the nervous system reacts under testing situations, as well as other body reactions. This is not sufficient enought to deternmine wether someone is lying or not, is guilty or not. Someone can be nervous, and the polygraph can identify it, but this does not neccesarily mean a person can be found guilty.
Answer:
I'm nots sure what the question is asking but I'm going on a limb and say that that's the twitter logo.
Explanation:
The Twitter logo is a blue bird
