Answer: d. rule 26
Explanation:
An expert witness has technical knowledge or education that adds credibility to a testimony or an argument in a civil proceeding. While there are other sources for providing this technical know-how, using an expert witness is more common.
Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure defines the conditions under which such a witness can be introduced into the proceeding. The name and contact details of the expert witness must be provided. Also, a copy of all the documents that may be used to support a claim or defense must be provided.
Answer:
Explanation:
In the 1830s, American abolitionists, led by Evangelical Protestants, gained momentum in their battle to end slavery. Abolitionists believed that slavery was a national sin, and that it was the moral obligation of every American to help eradicate it from the American landscape by gradually freeing the slaves and returning them to Africa.. Not all Americans agreed. Views on slavery varied state by state, and among family members and neighbors. Many Americans—Northerners and Southerners alike—did not support abolitionist goals, believing that anti-slavery activism created economic instability and threatened the racial social order.
But by the mid-nineteenth century, the ideological contradictions between a national defense of slavery on American soil on the one hand, and the universal freedoms espoused in the Declaration of Independence on the other hand, had created a deep moral schism in the national culture. During the thirty years leading up to the Civil War, anti-slavery organizations proliferated, and became increasingly effective in their methods of resistance. As the century progressed, branches of the abolitionist movement became more radical, calling for the immediate end of slavery. Public opinion varied widely, and different branches of the movement disagreed on how to achieve their aims. But abolitionists found enough strength in their commonalities—a belief in individual liberty and a strong Protestant evangelical faith—to move their agenda forward
Because the need to "repeal" amendments was sometimes necessary and desired by the people, as in the 18th amendment.
The correct answer is none of the options listed. This study is faulty because the anthropologist has not been comparative. Anthropologists need to be comparative in their research, meaning that they need to take into consideration the similarities and differences of many many different societies and cultures before making any conclusions about human nature, society, or the past.
