1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wel
3 years ago
10

Please answer my question fast!

History
2 answers:
Tom [10]3 years ago
7 0
Alaska? I think.........
ad-work [718]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Alaska kodiak island

Explanation:

A

You might be interested in
How did the some colonists protest to the quartering act
gtnhenbr [62]
The New York colonial assembly refused to comply, which prohibited the assembly from enacting any further legislation until they complied.

This resulted in skrimishes on the streets of New York.
8 0
3 years ago
Since 1970 the average house holf size has decreased due to what
Murrr4er [49]

It decreased because couples have been having less children than what couples been having before then

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was an agreement between the United States and Great Britain that eventually served as a model for the Un
goldfiish [28.3K]

Answer:

The Atlantic Charter was an agreement between the United States and Great Britain that eventually served as a model for the United Nations.

Explanation:

The Atlantic Charter was a diplomatic act signed by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill on August 14, 1941 aboard the battleship Prince of Wales anchored in the Terranova Bay, among the Allied powers, which foresaw the enunciation of some principles for the future world order: prohibition of territorial expansions, internal and external self-determination, democracy, peace understood as freedom from fear and want, renunciation of the use of force, and a general security system that would allow disarmament. It resumed Wilson's "Fourteen Points" and affirmed the freedom of trade and navigation and the right of peoples to live "[...] free from fear and want". It was the seed of the birth of the UN and was consistent with the Stimson Doctrine, a declaration of general rejection of the territorial acquisitions obtained with the use of force, and with the Welles Declaration, issued in the particular case of the Soviet occupation of the Baltic republics.

7 0
3 years ago
What military advantages did each side have during the civil war?
Vlada [557]
The North had certain advantages. (1) More than twice as many people lived in the North as in the South - 22 million in the North and 9 million in the South. Of the 9 million people in the South, two out of every five were blacks, most of whom were slaves. Slaves were not expected to fight. The slaves, however, might do the work at home and thus release white men to join the army. (2) Not only did the North have more people, but it had more resources and supplies. Most of the factories which could make guns, ammunition, uniforms, and the thousands of articles needed in war, were in the North. The North had more railroads to move goods and more men to do the fighting. It also had more shipping. (3) Furthermore, the United States government, its army, and its navy were already established and working. The South had to build these things as it went along. On the other hand, the South possessed certain advantages over the North. (1) For one thing, the South was fighting for the most part on its own soil. Men fight harder when they are defending their homes than when they are invading enemy territory. Also, they know the territory much better than the invaders possibly could. (2) In addition, the South had many outstanding military leaders who had resigned from the United States Army to fight for the Confederacy. Among these men was Robert E. Lee. Although Lee belonged to an old southern family, he did not believe in slavery and had already freed his slaves. Lee was also against secession and opposed to the war. But he could not bring himself to bear arms against his beloved state, Virginia. When that state seceded, therefore, Lee cast his lot with the Confederacy. Thus the South gained a brilliant general – the ablest and most thoroughly experienced in the whole United States Army. 
8 0
3 years ago
Why did the Dakota Sioux attack settlements in Minnesota in 1862? Check each of the reasons that support what you’ve learned.
Levart [38]

Answer:

A, B, D

Explanation:

The Dakota Sioux attack settlements in Minnesota in 1862 following a series of neglect from the government, looming starvation as a result of cutworms effect on farms, and occasional confrontations with the white settlers in the area

Hence, Dakota Sioux attack settlements in Minnesota in 1862 because of the following reasons:

1. Government officials withheld cash and food that was promised the Dakota.

2. The Dakota were not given enough food and faced starvation.

3. Many Dakota resented settlers for taking their land and confining them to a reservation.

Therefore, the correct answer is option A, B, and C

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Media impact has become an important fact of electoral politics. Which of the following explains the limits of the media’s influ
    8·2 answers
  • Democracy developed in Athens around
    13·2 answers
  • How did industrialization cause the united states to become more involved in world affairs?
    6·2 answers
  • Identify a big part in world history that is important
    5·1 answer
  • In december 1999, boris yeltsin resigned as russia's president because __________.
    13·1 answer
  • In the 1700s, people in Virginia are​
    13·1 answer
  • What was elie wiesel doing at the end of his life? please answer fast!!!
    7·1 answer
  • What economic system did colonialism strengthen as trade increased between European empires? ​
    9·2 answers
  • !PLEASE HELP ME OUT ASAP!
    9·1 answer
  • What caused conflict between Native Americans and settlers on the Great Plains?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!