The conclusion needs to <u>be backed up by more </u><u>evidences</u> only then scientists make a claim.
Finding one type of bacteria that can survive in an oxygen-free environment does not prove that many other organisms can as well. It is important to understand the biological processes that give <u>organisms the traits that enable them to live in settings devoid of </u><u>oxygen</u>. More data from many groups of species are required to support the statement.
<h3>In what all conditions can bacteria thrive?</h3>
Although bacteria can survive at higher and lower temperatures than humans, they thrive in an environment that is <u>warm, wet, protein-rich, and</u><u> pH neutral</u><u> or </u><u>slightly acidic</u><u>.</u> However, there are several exceptions. While certain bacteria can <u>survive in extremely hot or cold </u><u>environments</u>, others can endure excessively acidic or salty environments. The danger zone, or the temperature range <u>between 41 and 135 degrees Fahrenheit</u>, is where most pathogenic bacteria thrive.
<h3 />
To learn more about anaerobic bacteria:
brainly.com/question/11451338
#SPJ4
Answer:Thier effects
Explanation:it was either B or C, but I think C may be the best choice because you have to know what happens after you do the experiment?
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. Below are choices that I manage to check from other sources:
A. A weed is uprooted from the soil.
B. Oxygen is removed from the water in a fish’s bowl.
C. A cactus is moved from a sunny windowsill to a dark room.
D. The water bowl is removed from a hamster’s cage.
The answer is C.
Answer:
C. Responsiveness and timing
Explanation:
I just know it, I really don't know how to explain