This depends on ideals and opinions but from my point of view it is not a fair and democratic way of selecting the president due to the fact that the citizens of this country have no real say in who is president. Therefore it is not democratic. Fair? No because the electoral college Can have biases just like any other human and they are not the majority. This goes hand in hand with the democracy question. If I was to be democratic. The citizens should cancel out what the electoral college says.
Now I’m the side of the reasoning as to why the electoral college exists. It’s understandable. Everyone is not trustable enough to decide the fate of the country. Overall it is not fair and democratic.
<em>Answer: </em><em>These were the effects of World War I on Germany:</em>
<em />
<em>Many civilians were starving due to naval blockades. (From 1914 to 1919, Germany suffered a naval blockade in the hands of the Allies)</em>
<em>The nation was held responsible for the war and had to pay for other countries' losses. (The Treaty of Versailles stated everything that Germany was blamed for and how they were to repay for the damages)</em>
<em>The nation’s leader went into exile. (Wilhelm II fled to the Netherlands)</em>
<em>These were the effects of World War I on the United States:</em>
<em />
<em>The nation celebrated Armistice Day with the other allies who had won the war.</em>
<em>The nation teamed with others to create the Treaty of Versailles.</em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em />
Answer:
the Knight needed to be sure that the lord would protect him in exchange for his service as a skilled warrior.
Explanation:
Most Americans could not embrace Woodrow Wilson idea of a league of nations
