1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yuradex [85]
3 years ago
15

What was the outcome of the Seven Weeks' War? A.Austria won and reasserted herself as leader of Germany. B.Prussia won and reass

erted herself as leader of Germany. C.France won and reasserted herself as leader of Germany. D. No one won. It was a stalemate.
History
2 answers:
Aleks04 [339]3 years ago
7 0

The answer is letter C. Prussia won and reasserted herself as leader of Germany.

The Seven Weeks War was also known as the Austro-Prussian War. This war was a war between the German Confederation under the leadership of Austria against German cities under the leadership of Prussia. The war ended with Prussia taking over the leadership of Germany, which ended up to the unification of Germany.

Ganezh [65]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

C)

Prussia won and reasserted itself as leader of Germany.

Explanation:

Prussian-led Germany would forever exclude Austria. After this victory, the German Confederation was officially dissolved, and several northern German states joined into a North German Confederation with Prussia. In 1867, Bismarck was appointed Chancellor of the North German Confederation, and Wilhelm I served as president.

You might be interested in
Errington and Gewertz think that Diamond misunderstood what New Guineans really wanted from Westerners when he interpreted the m
AleksandrR [38]

Answer:

1)By "cargo," Diamond felt that Yali meant "material goods, the trappings of technology, "ranging from steel axes, matches, and medicines to clothing, soft drinks, and umbrellas." He saw it as a discussion of the lack of equality in the world and a question of why development occurred at such different rates in different places.

2) Errington and Gewertz believed that Diamond misunderstood Yali's question about cargo because he interpreted it to be a question about technology and goods. However, Errington and Gewertz believed that what Yali really meant about it, was a question about relationships and social structure.

Explanation:

The answers were found in the book titled "Guns, Gems and Steel" by Jared Diamond

5 0
3 years ago
Summarize the causes of the French and Indian war
Irina-Kira [14]
The French and Indian War, which took place between 1754-1763, began due to a conflict between England and France over control of the Ohio River Valley. Both sides wanted the valley so they could expand their settlements into the area.
8 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast the roles of slaves and freemen in the Roman Republic.
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

1. Roman slavery was not based on race so sometimes it was hard to differ if someone was a slave or not (everyone looked similar).

2. Both roles are pretty similar except for the fact that slaves are forced into labor work and freed men work on their own free will and are treated better.

3. Slaves are abused and treated badly and freemen aren't.

4. Slaves were used in all forms of work except for public office.

5. Often times employed men and slaves would work together except that the free employed men would get paid and the slaves wouldn't (this usually happened when one cannot find enough slaves to work and can only conclude to using paid workers so that's when they end up getting mixed together).

The role of slaves and freemen seem very similar in a lot of aspects (despite the fact that slaves cannot work in public office) but they are ranked by their parents (if your parents are slaves then you're born a slave) and slaves can also be chosen out of something like a battle. If they lose they are taken in as slaves. What I'm trying to say is that freedom was not a right but a privilege for people in the Roman Republic. Things like battles were used to justify and confirm superiority over the losers and gave the winners divine right to rule over the losers (slaves) and treat them badly. At a point the slaves were practically invisible.

Explanation:

ik know i already answer this one but can you give brainlist again

4 0
1 year ago
What was sold in ancient rome
Leona [35]

Answer: beef, corn, glassware, iron, lead, leather, marble, olive oil, perfumes, purple dye, silk, silver, spices, timber, tin and wine.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which planet is an inner planet, and which one is an outer planet? Explain your answer
igomit [66]

Answer:

Explanation:

proof

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What two countries remained undefeated by Napoleon?
    9·2 answers
  • Adidas and Volkswagen are companies from what country?
    9·2 answers
  • Which event had the immediate effect of causing Germany to declare war on the Allies?
    11·2 answers
  • Why was Napoleon's delay of the retreat from Moscow such a great mistake?
    5·1 answer
  • why did Herman Talmadge feel like he had the right to to the position as governor after the 1946 election
    12·1 answer
  • How does the United States view terrorist groups in the Middle East? (AKS49d) (DOK 1)
    5·2 answers
  • Identify TWO general categories of motives for the new interest in science in the 16th century. For each category you identify,
    6·1 answer
  • Explain what you think the author suggests by referring to the soldiers at Kronstadt as the "reddest of the red​
    10·1 answer
  • How do special-interest groups influence public policy?
    12·1 answer
  • What items did John cabot discover on his expeditions and or bring to the new land?​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!