Answer:
Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.
Explanation:
Answer:
- The games were too closely related to an official school activity, showing religious support.
Explanation:
In Santa Fe District v. Doe, the court decided that understudy drove petition at a school football match-up fizzled the Lemon test since it was "excessively caught". This implies the court thought the amusements were excessively firmly identified with school action.
Along these lines, the football match couldn't be viewed as a private movement, yet open since it was empowered by the school. Additionally, the discourse radiating from this occasion would be open, and being straightforwardly energized by the school, would damage the Establishment Clause, by connecting legitimately to a substance of the government of the United States (the school) with religious issues.
An allusion is something that is not real look very real.
Mexico has a temperate climate
Marquette and Joliet sailed down part of the Mississippi.
